ReviewActa neurochirurgica2019
Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06776614 (A Comparative-effectiveness Study on Expansion Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy for Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Intracranial Compartment Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparative-effectiveness Study on Expansion Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy for Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Intracranial Compartment Syndrome
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-craniectomy hydrocephalus in adult traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and outcome.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Basal cisternostomy as an adjunct to decompressive hemicraniectomy in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study in comparing decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy in patients with acute subdural hematoma.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Cerebral Autoregulation in Non-Brain Injured Patients: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: 2020 Update of the Decompressive Craniectomy Recommendations.Neurosurgery · 2020Guideline
- Trial
- Patient Outcomes at Twelve Months after Early Decompressive Craniectomy for Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury in the Randomized DECRA Clinical Trial.Journal of neurotrauma · 2020Trial
- Neuromonitoring in the Decompressed Brain: Rethinking Physiology, Monitoring, and Thresholds After Decompressive Craniectomy.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- The top 100 most cited peer-reviewed publications on global neurosurgery: Mapping research trends and gaps over four decades.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Review
- Dynamic Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter on Computed Tomography Predict Decompressive Efficacy and Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hinge craniotomy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a narrative review and national survey among Mexican neurosurgeons.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting secondary decompressive craniectomy in TBI patients after emergent craniotomy with bone flap replacement.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Case Report: Debridement with vacuum sealing drainage for conservative management of post-cranioplasty surgical site infection.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy size in traumatic brain injury; an international, observational, comparative effectiveness study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Article
- Score to scan: Is there a link between Glasgow Coma Scale score and CT neuroimaging findings in trauma?SA journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Bite Force after Cranioplasty with and without Temporalis Dissection in Large Skull Defects Caused by Decompressive Craniectomy.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Mortality During In-Hospital Stay and the First 24 h After Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Early Positive Fluid Balance Associates with Increased Mortality in Neurological Critically Ill Patients: A 10-Year Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors at 20 institutions in 20 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTwo randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach.
methodsThe International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017. The meeting was jointly organised by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), AO/Global Neuro and the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma. Discussions and voting were organised around six pre-specified themes: (1) primary DC for mass lesions, (2) secondary DC for intracranial hypertension, (3) peri-operative care, (4) surgical technique, (5) cranial reconstruction and (6) DC in low- and middle-income countries.
resultsThe invited participants discussed existing published evidence and proposed consensus statements. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval.
conclusionsIn this manuscript, we present the final consensus-based recommendations. We have also identified areas of uncertainty, where further research is required, including the role of primary DC, the role of hinge craniotomy and the optimal timing and material for skull reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.