SynthesisEuropean radiology2019
CT compared to MRI for functional evaluation of the right ventricle: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Phase-resolved MRI for measurement of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation defects in comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI andBMJ open respiratory research · 2024Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology and the Brazilian College of Radiology - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of right ventricular failure secondary to acutely increased right ventricular afterload (acute cor pulmonale): a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2024Article
- [Using CT to Evaluate Cardiac Function].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Review
- Technical Recommendations for Computed Tomography Guidance of Intervention in the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract: Native RVOT, Conduits, and Bioprosthetic Valves.World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2023Article
- End-Systolic Eccentricity Index Obtained by Enhanced Computed Tomography Is a Predictor of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multi-Modality Imaging for Interventions in Tricuspid Valve Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Update on noninvasive imaging of right ventricle dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Functional cardiac CT-Going beyond Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease with Cine CT, CT-FFR, CT Perfusion and Machine Learning.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Comparison of single-source cardiac CT and CMR quantified ventricular volumes and function in congenital heart disease.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyArticle
- Technical Recommendations for Computed Tomography Guidance of Intervention in the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract: Native RVOT, Conduits and Bioprosthetic Valves: A White Paper of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society (CHSS), and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRight ventricular function (RVF) is a strong predictor of adverse cardiac events; however, the reference standard for RVF assessment, MRI, is limited in some patients for whom accurate evaluation of RVF is essential, like those with COPD or non-MR compatible metal implants. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate whether CT was as accurate as MRI for the assessment of RVF.
methodWe conducted a meta-analysis of studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central searches to evaluate the differences and correlations between the following RVF parameters as measured by CT and MRI: end diastole volume (EDV), end systole volume (ESV), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and stroke volume (SV).
resultsSixteen studies that used disk summation (637 subjects) and three studies that used three-dimensional reconstruction were included. For the 16 studies, the pooled standard mean differences (95% confidence interval) were 1.04 (- 2.59, 4.67) for EDV, 1.22 (1.50, 3.95) for ESV, - 0.65 (- 2.60, 1.29) for RVEF, and - 0.37 (- 3.64, 2.90) for SV. The overall correlation coefficient (r) values were 0.98 for EDV, 0.95 for ESV, 0.98 for RVEF, and 0.97 for SV. The mean difference between the two methods was not statistically significant (overall effect Z test, p > 0.1).
conclusionCT can assess RVF with accuracy comparable to that of MRI. Thus, CT is a valid alternative to MRI. KEY POINTS: • CT could help clinicians to assess RVF as accurately as MRI can, with satisfactory repeatability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31134368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.