ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of iodine quantification and material density imaging with rapid Kilovoltage-switching DECT for small hyperattenuating renal lesions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Beyond Conventional CT: Role of Dual-Energy CT in Monitoring Response to Therapy in Abdominal Malignancies.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Review
- Applicability of Bosniak 2019 for renal mass classification on portal venous phase at the era of spectral CT imaging using rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT.European radiology · 2024Article
- Spectral CT imaging versus conventional CT post-processing technique in differentiating malignant and benign renal tumors.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic performance of single-phase dual-energy CT to differentiate vascular and nonvascular incidental renal lesions on portal venous phase: comparison with CT.European radiology · 2021Article
- Liver fibrosis assessment with multiphasic dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance of iodine uptake parameters.European radiology · 2021Article
- Use of dual-energy CT for renal mass assessment.European radiology · 2021Review
- Building a dual-energy CT service line in abdominal radiology.European radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the effect of dual-energy CT (DECT) material density datasets on diagnostic performance, readers' confidence, and interpretation time for renal lesion detection and characterization in comparison to subtraction CT (SCT). MATERIAL AND
methodsOne hundred fourteen patients (69/45 = M/F, mean age = 67 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT between January 2015 and February 2018 for suspected renal mass were included retrospectively. For each patient, three radiologists assessed three image datasets: group A, material density iodine (MDI) + material density water (MDW); group B, SCT only; and group C, SCT + true unenhanced phase + virtual monochromatic images at 65 keV. Readers evaluated image quality (4-point scale), the number of lesions, and likely diagnosis. Reading times were recorded. Quantitatively, iodine concentration (IC from MDI) and delta Hounsfield units (ΔHU) for all lesions were measured. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Image quality and interpretation time were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and t tests.
resultsStudy cohort (230 lesions; mean size = 23.63 mm (5-116 mm)) consisted of 60 enhancing, 158 non-enhancing, and 12 lipid-dominant angiomyolipoma lesions. Significantly higher image quality was demonstrated for MDI compared to SCT (mean score = 3.82 vs. 3; p < 0.05). Comparable diagnostic accuracy was observed for group A (AUC = 0.88) and group C (AUC = 0.87) and was higher compared to that for group B (AUC = 0.75). Group A was read faster than group C (41.49 s vs. 71.45 s per exam; p < 0.05). Both IC and ΔHU values had high accuracy (AUC = 0.97) for differentiating enhancing vs. non-enhancing lesions; however, IC enabled differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other enhancing lesions with moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.73).
conclusionMDI images increase readers' confidence for renal lesion detection and characterization while providing a more efficient radiologist workflow, irrespective of readers' experience. KEY POINTS: • Material density iodine (MDI) images enable faster interpretation due to high image quality and potentially reduced need for quantitation. • MDI images increase diagnostic confidence of readers, irrespective of radiologists' experience. • High accuracy with dual-energy CT (DECT) can potentially reduce healthcare costs by eliminating the need for additional investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.