ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019
GC-MS analysis of volatile organic compounds from Bambara groundnut rhizobacteria and their antibacterial properties.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- GCMS and Molecular Docking Based Insights into the Antifungal Potential of Bacillus Bs-06 Against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.The protein journal · 2026Article
- GC-MS based bioactive profiling of Phyllanthus niruri and its antibacterial potential through experimental and computational studies.PloS one · 2026Article
- Fast-growingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Phytoconstituents, Antioxidant Activity and Cytotoxicity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In Vitro Antiprotozoal Activity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Plant-AssociatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Decrypting the multi-functional biological activators and inducers of defense responses against biotic stresses in plants.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Genomic mechanisms of plant growth-promoting bacteria in the production of leguminous crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- GC-MS profiling ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
- Bambara Groundnut Rhizobacteria Antimicrobial and Biofertilization Potential.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genome Mining of Three Plant Growth-Promoting Bacillus Species from Maize Rhizosphere.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2021Article
- The Role of High-Resolution Analytical Techniques in the Development of Functional Foods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Bambara groundnut soil metagenomics data.Data in brief · 2020Article
- Bacterial and Fungal Endophytes: Tiny Giants with Immense Beneficial Potential for Plant Growth and Sustainable Agricultural Productivity.Microorganisms · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial metabolites have been observed to be important in new drug formulation for both plant, animals and human beings. The aim of this study was to identify the different bioactive compounds found in three rhizobacterial isolates (B. amyloliquefaciens, B. thuringiensis and Bacillus sp.) from the rhizosphere of Bambara groundnut and to assay for their antibacterial properties. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to carry out the analysis using seven extraction solvents. In the GC-MS analysis, 68 compounds were identified based on peak area percentage, retention time and structure. From the bioactive compounds in B. amyloliquefaciens and B. thuringiensis, the peak area percentage shows that dimethylfuvene from ethyl acetate extraction had the highest relative abundance with 89.11% while Formic acid 2-methylpropyl ester from hexane extraction had the lowest with 6.25%. Others are tridecane, acetic acid butyl ester, paraldehyde, s-(+)-1,2 propanediol, tropone, phthalan and p-xylene with relative abundance of 61.72%, 60.41%, 83.79%, 71.53%, 24.06%, 86.72% and 64.33% respectively. These extracts inhibited the growth of the four test organisms, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Micrococcus cryophilus and Enterococcus feacalis. Butanol extract from B. amyloliquefaciens had 28 mm zone of inhibition against B. cereus compared to 18 mm and 16 mm by Bacillus sp. and B. thuringiensis respectively. Its zone of inhibition was 24 mm zone against M. cryophilus compared to 12 mm and 19 mm by Bacillus sp. and B. thuringiensis respectively. Butanol extract from B. thuringiensis suppressed E. feacalis and P. aeruginosa having 23 mm and 26 mm zones of inhibition respectively. This was higher compared to Bacillus sp. and B. amyloliquefaciens having 18 mm/15 mm and 21 mm/15 mm against E. feacalis and P. aeruginosa respectively. Hexane and ethyl acetate extract from Bacillus sp. suppressed P. aeruginosa with 12 mm and 17 mm inhibition zones respectively compared to no inhibition zones from hexane extract of B. amyloliquefaciens and B. thuringiensis. Zones of inhibition of 2 mm and 6 mm were observed against P. aeruginosa from ethyl acetate extract of B. amyloliquefaciens and B. thuringiensis respectively. These results suggest that the three isolates are quite rich in the production of bioactive compounds that are also very effective antibacterial agents. These volatile organic compounds are promising compounds for more antibacterial bioactivity development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.