Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134302›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2019

The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box.

Andreas Prestel, Nanna Wichmann, Joao M Martins, Riccardo Marabini, Noah Kassem, Sebastian S Broendum, Marit Otterlei, Olaf Nielsen, Martin Willemoës, Michael Ploug and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiplex mapping of protein-protein interaction interfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiplex mapping of protein-protein interaction interfaces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas PrestelDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-1761
Nanna WichmannDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Joao M MartinsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Riccardo MarabiniDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Noah KassemDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Sebastian S BroendumDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Marit OtterleiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Olaf NielsenDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Martin WillemoësDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Michael PlougFinsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Wouter BoomsmaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. wb@di.ku.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8257-3827
Birthe B KragelundDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. bbk@bio.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden (DK) SYNERGY programmeStatens Naturvidenskabelige Forskningsrad 12-128803Statens Naturvidenskabelige Forskningsrad (DK) 4181-00344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a cellular hub in DNA metabolism and a potential drug target. Its binding partners carry a short linear motif (SLiM) known as the PCNA-interacting protein-box (PIP-box), but sequence-divergent motifs have been reported to bind to the same binding pocket. To investigate how PCNA accommodates motif diversity, we assembled a set of 77 experimentally confirmed PCNA-binding proteins and analyzed features underlying their binding affinity. Combining NMR spectroscopy, affinity measurements and computational analyses, we corroborate that most PCNA-binding motifs reside in intrinsically disordered regions, that structure preformation is unrelated to affinity, and that the sequence-patterns that encode binding affinity extend substantially beyond the boundaries of the PIP-box. Our systematic multidisciplinary approach expands current views on PCNA interactions and reveals that the PIP-box affinity can be modulated over four orders of magnitude by positive charges in the flanking regions. Including the flanking regions as part of the motif is expected to have broad implications, particularly for interpretation of disease-causing mutations and drug-design, targeting DNA-replication and -repair.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairDNA ReplicationHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenProtein ConformationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenAPIMDNA homeostasisIDPIntrinsically disorderedNMRp21SLiM

Identifiers

PMID31134302
PMCPMC6881253
OpenAlexW2946957646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.