Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134286›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2019

Prospect and challenge of detecting dynamic gene copy number increases in stem cells by whole genome sequencing.

Ulrike Fischer, Christina Backes, Tobias Fehlmann, Valentina Galata, Andreas Keller, Eckart Meese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrike Fischer *Department of Human Genetics, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. ulrike.fischer@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7808-9565
Christina Backes *Clinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Building E2.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Tobias FehlmannClinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Building E2.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Valentina GalataClinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Building E2.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Andreas KellerClinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Building E2.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Eckart MeeseDepartment of Human Genetics, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene amplification is an evolutionarily well-conserved and highly efficient mechanism to increase the amount of specific proteins. In humans, gene amplification is a hallmark of cancer and has recently been found during stem cell differentiation. Amplifications in stem cells are restricted to specific tissue areas and time windows, rendering their detection difficult. Here, we report on the performance of deep WGS sequencing (average 82-fold depth of coverage) on the BGISEQ with nanoball technology to detect amplifications in human mesenchymal and neural stem cells. As reference technology, we applied array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and qPCR. Using different in silico strategies for amplification detection, we analyzed the potential of WGS for amplification detection. Our results provide evidence that WGS accurately identifies changes of the copy number profiles in human stem cell differentiation. However, the identified changes are not in all cases consistent between WGS and aCGH. The results between WGS and the validation by qPCR were concordant in 83.3% of all tested 36 cases. In sum, both genome-wide techniques, aCGH and WGS, have unique advantages and specific challenges, calling for locus-specific confirmation by the low-throughput approaches qPCR or FISH. KEY MESSAGES: WGS allows for the identification of dynamic copy number changes in human stem cells. Less stringent threshold setting is crucial for detection of copy number increase. Broad knowledge of dynamic copy number is pivotal to estimate stem cell capabilities.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGene DosageMesenchymal Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsWhole Genome SequencingCell LineHumansCDK4Gene amplificationNeural stem cellSHANK3WGS

Identifiers

PMID31134286
PMCPMC6647207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.