ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019
Taking Dogs Into the Office: A Novel Strategy for Promoting Work Engagement, Commitment and Quality of Life.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefits and risks of staff-owned dogs in small animal clinics: perspectives of employees that bring their dog to work.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Demands and resources of a long-standing bring-your-dog-to-work program: a constant comparative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- How Guilt Drives Emotional Exhaustion in Work-Pet Family Conflict.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The Role of Dogs in the Relationship between Telework and Performance via Affect: A Moderated Moderated Mediation Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- A Scoping Review of the Benefits and Challenges of Using Service Dogs for Finding and Maintaining Employment.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Animal-Assisted Intervention and Health Care Workers' Psychological Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Perspectives on facility dogs from pediatric hospital personnel: A qualitative content analysis of patient, family, and staff outcomes.Complementary therapies in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Friends with Benefits: The Positive Consequences of Pet-Friendly Practices for Workers' Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Dogs at the Workplace: A Multiple Case Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite growing interest in "take your dog to work" days and the wellbeing benefits associated with interactions with a friendly dog (e.g., animal-assisted activities), there has been little quantification of the benefits of this. We analyzed responses to work-related (work engagement, turnover intention, work-based friendship acuity, social media use, and work-related quality of life) and dog-related (pet dog attachment and dog general health) scales from 749 employees. The predominantly female sample was comprised of 243 employees who brought their dog to work (167 = "often" brought dog to work; 76 = "sometimes" brought dog to work), the remaining 506 did not bring their dog to work. Employees who "often" took their dog to work reported higher than average work engagement on all factors (vigor, dedication, absorption, total), with significant differences reported in comparison to those who "sometimes" (vigor and total) and "never" (vigor, dedication, absorption, total) took their dog to work. Turnover intention was also significantly lower and work-based friendship acuity higher in the group of employees who "often," compared to "never," took their dog to work. Benefits of bringing your dog to work were also observed in terms of work-related quality of life, with higher scores on general wellbeing, home-work interface, job career-satisfaction, control at work, working conditions, and overall work quality of life in those who "often" compared to "never" take their dog to work. Employees who "never" took their dog to work reported lower use of social media during break times. We also identified factors which may be important to consider in developing dogs-in-the-workplace policies; dog-demographics including weight (i.e., size), breed-type, and training may be important to consider in defining the ideal office dog and deserve further research. Given the need to improve employee wellbeing and satisfaction to promote effective business performance and economic gain, these results have important implications for office based businesses considering allowing dogs in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.