Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Development of Genome-Wide SNP Markers for Barley via Reference- Based RNA-Seq Analysis.

Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Goro Ishikawa, Eri Ogiso-Tanaka, Takashi Yanagisawa, Kazuhiro Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Barley Glycosyltransferase GenePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Two dominant genes in barley (Breeding science · 2022
    Article
  8. Development of a genome-wide marker design workflow for onions and its application in target amplicon sequencing-based genotyping.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. History and future perspectives of barley genomics.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tsuyoshi TanakaBreeding Informatics Research Unit, Division of Basic Research, Institute of Crop Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan.
Goro IshikawaBreeding Strategies Research Unit, Division of Basic Research, Institute of Crop Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan.
Eri Ogiso-TanakaSoybean and Field Crop Applied Genomics Research Unit, Division of Field Crop Research, Institute of Crop Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan.
Takashi YanagisawaWheat and Barley Breeding Unit, Division of Wheat and Barley Research, Institute of Crop Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan.
Kazuhiro SatoGroup of Genome Diversity, Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marker-assisted selection of crop plants requires DNA markers that can distinguish between the closely related strains often used in breeding. The availability of reference genome sequence facilitates the generation of markers, by elucidating the genomic positions of new markers as well as of their neighboring sequences. In 2017, a high quality genome sequence was released for the six-row barley (

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingbarleygenotypingJapanese barley breedingRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID31134117
PMCPMC6523396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.