Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134058›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Quantitative Mechanistic Modeling in Support of Pharmacological Therapeutics Development in Immuno-Oncology.

Kirill Peskov, Ivan Azarov, Lulu Chu, Veronika Voronova, Yuri Kosinsky, Gabriel Helmlinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy response evaluation using oncophysics-based mathematical models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multiscale modeling in disease.Current opinion in systems biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Evaluation of Combination Strategies for the AFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirill PeskovM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russia.
Ivan AzarovM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russia.
Lulu ChuQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, United States.
Veronika VoronovaM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russia.
Yuri KosinskyM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russia.
Gabriel HelmlingerQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the approval, in recent years, of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor, there has been an explosion in the development of immuno-modulating pharmacological modalities for the treatment of various cancers. From the discovery phase to late-stage clinical testing and regulatory approval, challenges in the development of immuno-oncology (IO) drugs are multi-fold and complex. In the preclinical setting, the multiplicity of potential drug targets around immune checkpoints, the growing list of immuno-modulatory molecular and cellular forces in the tumor microenvironment-with additional opportunities for IO drug targets, the emergence of exploratory biomarkers, and the unleashed potential of modality combinations all have necessitated the development of quantitative, mechanistically-oriented systems models which incorporate key biology and patho-physiology aspects of immuno-oncology and the pharmacokinetics of IO-modulating agents. In the clinical setting, the qualification of surrogate biomarkers predictive of IO treatment efficacy or outcome, and the corresponding optimization of IO trial design have become major challenges. This mini-review focuses on the evolution and state-of-the-art of quantitative systems models describing the tumor vs. immune system interplay, and their merging with quantitative pharmacology models of IO-modulating agents, as companion tools to support the addressing of these challenges.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorHumansMedical OncologyAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, Tumorimmuno-oncologymechanistic modelsmolecular and cellular biomarkerspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticssystems pharmacologytumor vs. immune system

Identifiers

PMID31134058
PMCPMC6524731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.