Comparative Genomics Reveals the High Copy Number Variation of a Retro Transposon in Different

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Comparative genomics of Eastern-IndianFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
   Article
2. Intraspecific Variation of Transposable Elements Reveals Differences in the Evolutionary History of Fungal Phytopathogen Pathotypes.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
   Article
3. Recent Advances in Effector Research ofBiomolecules · 2023
   Review
4. The Devastating Rice Blast Airborne PathogenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
5. Understanding the Dynamics of Blast Resistance in Rice-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Review
6. Proteinaceous effector discovery and characterization in filamentous plant pathogens.Molecular plant pathology · 2020
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as