ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2019
Patients', Carers', and the Public's Perspectives on Electroconvulsive Therapy.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The differential effects of psychiatrists' and patients' prior experiences on views about psychiatric electroceutical interventions.Journal of psychiatric research · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Electroconvulsive therapy and autobiographical memory.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026Article
- A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Electroconvulsive therapy in a tertiary Australian mental health facility between 2009 and 2020.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for using electroconvulsive therapy in elderly depressive patients.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Review
- Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.AJOB empirical bioethics · 2024Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on electroconvulsive therapy practice across Canadian provinces during the first wave of the pandemic.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- The influence of prior awareness on views about psychiatric electroceutical interventions among non-clinician stakeholders.Npj mental health research · 2023Article
- Assessment of beliefs and attitudes about electroconvulsive therapy posted on Twitter: An observational study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023Observational
- Late to respond, but early to relapse - An abnormal course of electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia during times of COVID-19.Psychiatry research case reports · 2022Article
- Rapprochement and Reform: Overcoming Factionalism in Policy Making for Serious Mental Illness.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Recipients' experience with information provision for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Improving attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy.BJPsych bulletin · 2022Article
- The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- A qualitative study of key stakeholders' perceived risks and benefits of psychiatric electroceutical interventions.Health, risk & society · 2021Article
- Crossing Death Valley: Bringing Neurotechnology to Psychiatric Clinics in Alberta, Canada.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.