Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31133819›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2019

Large-Area Fluorescence and Electron Microscopic Correlative Imaging With Multibeam Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Shinsuke Shibata, Taro Iseda, Takayuki Mitsuhashi, Atsushi Oka, Tomoko Shindo, Nobuko Moritoki, Toshihiro Nagai, Shinya Otsubo, Takashi Inoue, Erika Sasaki and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of Brain, Blood, and Testis Phenotypes Lacking theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shinsuke ShibataElectron Microscope Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro IsedaElectron Microscope Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki MitsuhashiDepartment of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi OkaDepartment of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko ShindoElectron Microscope Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuko MoritokiElectron Microscope Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro NagaiElectron Microscope Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinya OtsuboDepartment of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi InoueCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki, Japan.
Erika SasakiCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki, Japan.
Chihiro AkazawaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takao TakahashiDepartment of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Richard SchalekDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jeff W LichtmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Hideyuki OkanoElectron Microscope Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPCentral Institute for Experimental Animals · JPHarvard University · USTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent improvements in correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) technology have led to dramatic improvements in the ability to observe tissues and cells. Fluorescence labeling has been used to visualize the localization of molecules of interest through immunostaining or genetic modification strategies for the identification of the molecular signatures of biological specimens. Newer technologies such as tissue clearing have expanded the field of observation available for fluorescence labeling; however, the area of correlative observation available for electron microscopy (EM) remains restricted. In this study, we developed a large-area CLEM imaging procedure to show specific molecular localization in large-scale EM sections of mouse and marmoset brain. Target molecules were labeled with antibodies and sequentially visualized in cryostat sections using fluorescence and gold particles. Fluorescence images were obtained by light microscopy immediately after antibody staining. Immunostained sections were postfixed for EM, and silver-enhanced sections were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in resin. Ultrathin sections for EM were prepared from fully polymerized resin blocks, collected on silicon wafers, and observed by multibeam scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Multibeam SEM has made rapid, large-area observation at high resolution possible, paving the way for the analysis of detailed structures using the CLEM approach. Here, we describe detailed methods for large-area CLEM in various tissues of both rodents and primates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCallithrixMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeuroimagingCLEMconnectomicscorrelative imagingimmuno-EMmultibeam SEM

Identifiers

PMID31133819
PMCPMC6517476
OpenAlexW2943905026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.