Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31133758›Full record

ReviewNature methods2019

Deep learning for cellular image analysis.

Erick Moen, Dylan Bannon, Takamasa Kudo, William Graf, Markus Covert, David Van Valen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 493 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
493citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

493 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A quantitative coordinate system for developmental dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

433 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erick Moen *Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Dylan Bannon *Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Takamasa KudoDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
William GrafDivision of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Markus CovertDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
David Van ValenDivision of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. vanvalen@caltech.edu.

Funding

Stanford Cancer Immune Monitoring and Analysis Center (CIMAC)U24CA224309 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sean Curtis Bendall, Holden T. Maecker · 2017 to 2026
$19.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA224309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in computer vision and machine learning underpin a collection of algorithms with an impressive ability to decipher the content of images. These deep learning algorithms are being applied to biological images and are transforming the analysis and interpretation of imaging data. These advances are positioned to render difficult analyses routine and to enable researchers to carry out new, previously impossible experiments. Here we review the intersection between deep learning and cellular image analysis and provide an overview of both the mathematical mechanics and the programming frameworks of deep learning that are pertinent to life scientists. We survey the field's progress in four key applications: image classification, image segmentation, object tracking, and augmented microscopy. Last, we relay our labs' experience with three key aspects of implementing deep learning in the laboratory: annotating training data, selecting and training a range of neural network architectures, and deploying solutions. We also highlight existing datasets and implementations for each surveyed application.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID31133758
PMCPMC8759575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.