Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31133596›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Pilot observational prospective cohort study on the use of a novel home-based urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) test to confirm ovulation when used as adjunct to fertility awareness methods (FAMs) stage 1.

Rene Leiva, Marie McNamara-Kilian, Helen Niezgoda, René Ecochard, Thomas Bouchard

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03230084 nacompletednot on this map

Use of a Home-based Urinary Pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) Test to Confirm Ovulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorBruyère Health Research Institute.Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled25ConditionsInfertility, FemaleArmsUrine PDG test
NCT07248046 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparing Cervical Mucus, PDG, LH, and Basal Body Temperature Combinations for Ovulation and Luteal Phase Identification Using the Premom Smartphone App Versus User-Read Test Results: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBruyère Health Research Institute.Ran2026 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsFertility, Mobile Applications, Artifical Intelligence, Cervical MucusArmsPremom App-Assisted Fertility Tracking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rene LeivaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Marie McNamara-KilianElisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Helen NiezgodaElisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
René EcochardBiostatistics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Thomas BouchardDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleOvulation confirmation is a fundamental component of the evaluation of infertility. PURPOSE: To inform the design of a larger clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of a new home-based pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG) urine test to confirm ovulation when compared with the standard of serum progesterone.

methodsIn this observational prospective cohort study (single group assignment) in an urban setting (stage 1), a convenience sample of 25 women (aged 18-42 years) collected daily first morning urine for luteinisinghormone (LH), PDG and kept a daily record of their cervical mucus for one menstrual cycle. Serum progesterone levels were measured to confirm ovulation. Sensitivity and specificity were used as the main outcome measures. Estimation of number of ultrasound (US)-monitored cycles needed for a future study was done using an exact binomial CI approach.

resultsRecruitment over 3 months was achieved (n=28) primarily via natural fertility regulation social groups. With an attrition rate of 22%, specificity of the test was 100% for confirming ovulation. Sensitivity varied depending on whether a peak-fertility mucus day or a positive LH test was observed during the cycle (85%-88%). Fifty per cent of participants found the test results easy to determine. A total of 73 US-monitored cycles would be needed to offer a narrow CI between 95% and 100%.

conclusionThis is first study to clinically evaluate this test when used as adjunct to the fertility awareness methods. While this pilot study was not powered to validate or test efficacy, it helped to provide information on power, recruitment and retention, acceptability of the procedures and ease of its use by the participants. Given this test had a preliminary result of 100% specificity, further research with a larger clinical trial (stage 2) is recommended to both improve this technology and incorporate additional approaches to confirm ovulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03230084.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFertilityHumansMenstrual CycleOvulationPilot ProjectsPregnanediolProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultPregnanediolpregnanediol-3 alpha-glucuronidegynaecologyreproductive medicinesubfertility

Identifiers

PMID31133596
PMCPMC6538017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.