Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31133408›Full record

ArticlePain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2020

Factors Influencing Judgments to Consult Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Factorial Survey Experiment.

Matthew J Witry, Barbara J St Marie, Brahmendra Reddy Viyyuri, Paul D Windschitl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Patients' Risk for Opioid Use Disorder.AACN advanced critical care · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew J WitryDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. Electronic address: matthew-witry@uiowa.edu.
Barbara J St MarieCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Brahmendra Reddy ViyyuriDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Paul D WindschitlDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Funding

Decision Support for Responsible Pain Management (DS-RPM)K23DA043049 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ST MARIE, BARBARA JEAN · 2017 to 2020
$595k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA043049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription monitoring programs (PMPs) can provide health care professionals with valuable information. However, few studies have explored providers' decision making for accessing PMPs.

aimsThis study aimed to identify provider characteristics and situational factors most influencing perceived importance of consulting the PMP for patients in a simulated context.

designThe study used a cross-sectional factorial survey. SETTINGS: The survey was administered electronically. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Community pharmacists, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), and physicians in Iowa.

methodsParticipants were recruited by mail which included a link to the online survey. The survey consisted of demographic questions, eight randomly generated vignettes, and one ranked item. The vignettes described a hypothetical prescription using eight experimental variables whose levels were randomly varied. Respondents evaluated each vignette for importance to access the PMP. Analyses used linear mixed-effects models in R (Version 3.5.0).

resultsA total of 138 responses were available for multilevel analysis. Women, physicians, and APRNs rated it more important to consult the PMP for a given prescription compared with men and pharmacists. Accessing a PMP was perceived as more important with cash payments, quantity dispensed, suspicion for misuse, hydromorphone and oxycodone prescriptions, and headache. Advancing age, postoperative pain, and anxiety or sleep indications were associated with less importance.

conclusionsAge, indication for prescribing, misuse, and payment mode each independently had greater importance to providers in accessing the PMP. This was the first study to isolate the influence of different controlled substances on how important it was to consult the PMP.

Indexed as

Moral ObligationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug MisusePrescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31133408
PMCPMC7110923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.