Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31132795›Full record

Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2019

Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine.

Peter J Goadsby, Linda A Wietecha, Ellen B Dennehy, Bernice Kuca, Michael G Case, Sheena K Aurora, Charly Gaul

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02605174 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of Three Doses of Lasmiditan (50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg) Compared to Placebo in the Acute TReaTment of MigrAiNe: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study (SPARTAN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2016 to 2017Enrolled3,005ConditionsMigraine With or Without AuraArmsLasmiditan 50 mg, Lasmiditan 100 mg, Lasmiditan 200 mg, Placebo
NCT05903040 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Lasmiditan as Acute Migraine Treatment: a Prospective, Multicentric, Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of FlorenceRan2023 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsMigraine, Migraine With Aura, Migraine Without Aura, Chronic MigraineArmsLasmiditan
NCT06267664 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Real-world Effectiveness and Tolerability of Triptans-Ditans-Gepants (TRIDIGEP): an International Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Clínico Universitario de ValladolidRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1,500ConditionsMigraine, Migraine Disorders, Migraine With Aura, Headache DisordersArmsPatients with migraine treated with triptans, Lasmiditan or Gepants
NCT07103694 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Italian Real-life Multicenter Observational Study on Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Innovative Drugs (Monoclonal Antibodies, Gepants, Ditans, Sumatriptan-naproxen) for Preventive or Acute Migraine Treatment.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS San Raffaele RomaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled2,641ConditionsEpisodic Migraine, Chronic Migraine, Medication Overuse HeadacheArmsanti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, gepants, combination of sumatriptan and naproxen, ditan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. The Effect and Safety of 5-HTBioMed research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Short-term efficacy and safety of lasmiditan, a novel 5-HTThe journal of headache and pain · 2020
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Efficacy of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of perimenstrual migraine.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter J GoadsbyNIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital; SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, and King's College London, UK.
Linda A WietechaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ellen B DennehyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Bernice KucaCoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael G CaseEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sheena K AuroraEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Charly GaulMigraine and Headache Clinic, Koenigstein im Taunus, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lasmiditan, a serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonist, was effective for acute treatment of patients with migraine in a phase 3 double-blind randomized controlled study. The current study was designed to replicate these findings in a generalizable population of patients with migraine, including those with a cardiovascular medical history. This prospective, double-blind, phase 3 multicentre study randomly assigned patients with migraine with and without aura (1:1:1:1 ratio) to oral lasmiditan 200 mg, 100 mg, 50 mg, or placebo. Patients were instructed to dose at home within 4 h of onset of migraine attack of at least moderate intensity and not improving. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients' headache pain-free and most bothersome symptom-free at 2 h post-dose for each dose of lasmiditan versus placebo (NCT02605174). Patients (n = 3005) were assigned and treated (n = 2583, safety population): 1938 lasmiditan (200 mg n = 528, 100 mg n = 532, and 50 mg n = 556 included in primary analysis) and 645 placebo (540 included in primary analysis). Most patients (79.2%) had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor at baseline, in addition to migraine. Lasmiditan was associated with significantly more pain freedom at 2 h (lasmiditan 200 mg: 38.8%, odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8-3.1, P < 0.001; 100 mg: 31.4%, odds ratio 1.7, 1.3-2.2, P < 0.001; 50 mg: 28.6%, odds ratio 1.5, 1.1-1.9, P = 0.003 versus placebo 21.3%) and freedom from most bothersome symptom at 2 h (lasmiditan 200 mg: 48.7%, odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.4, P < 0.001; 100 mg: 44.2%, odds ratio 1.6, 1.2-2.0, P < 0.001; 50 mg: 40.8%, odds ratio 1.4, 1.1-1.8, P = 0.009 versus placebo 33.5%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 253 of 649 (39.0%), 229 of 635 (36.1%), and 166 of 654 (25.4%) of patients on lasmiditan 200, 100, and 50 mg, respectively, versus 75 of 645 (11.6%) on placebo. Most adverse events were CNS-related and included dizziness, somnolence and paraesthesia. Lasmiditan was effective at 2 h post-dose for acute treatment of migraine at all oral doses tested. Efficacy and safety were consistent with the previous phase 3 study.

Indexed as

AdultBenzamidesCardiovascular DiseasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMigraine DisordersPiperidinesPyridinesRisk FactorsSerotonin Receptor AgonistsTime FactorsYoung AdultBenzamideslasmiditanPiperidinesPyridinesSerotonin Receptor Agonistsefficacylasmiditanmigrainephase 3safety/tolerability

Identifiers

PMID31132795
PMCPMC6620826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.