Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31132582›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal2019

Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials.

Maayan Konigstein, Mahesh V Madhavan, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Hussein M Rahim, Iva Srdanovic, Fotis Gkargkoulas, Ghazaleh Mehdipoor, Evan Shlofmitz, Akiko Maehara, Björn Redfors and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: From Theory to Practice.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of Diabetes on Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
  7. Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Interventions: A Focused Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI - design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maayan KonigsteinClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Mahesh V MadhavanDivision of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Ori Ben-YehudaClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Hussein M RahimDivision of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Iva SrdanovicClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Fotis GkargkoulasClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Ghazaleh MehdipoorClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Evan ShlofmitzClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Akiko MaeharaClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Björn RedforsClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ankita K GoreDivision of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Thomas McAndrewClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Gregg W StoneClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Ziad A AliClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: zaa2112@columbia.edu.

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007854 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Marwah Abdalla, Michael Argenziano · 1996 to 2026
$14.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-eluting stents (DESs) have improved clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nevertheless, adverse events related to previously treated lesion still occur. We sought to evaluate the incidence and predictors of target lesion failure (TLF) in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation.

methodsPatient-level data from 6 prospective, randomized trials were pooled, and DES treatment outcomes were analyzed at up to 5 years. Primary outcome was TLF (cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel myocardial infarction). Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify predictors of TLF.

resultsOverall, 10,072 patients were included in the analysis. TLF rate was 1.7%, 4.3%, and 11.9% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively. The only independent predictor of TLF at 30 days was stent length (hazard ratio [HR] 1.017, 95% CI 1.011-1.024, P < .0001). Moderate/severe calcification, stent length and post procedural diameter sthenosis were predictors between 30 days to 1 year but not at 1 to 5 years. Reference vessel diameter was the only lesion-related predictor at 5 years (P = .003). Clinical predictors of TLF between 30 days and 1 year were diabetes and hypertension (P < .01 for both), and between 1 and 5 years, diabetes (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13-1.73, P = .002), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.92-3.30, P < .0001), and prior PCI (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.64, P = .04) predicted TLF.

conclusionsPredictors of TLF vary in the early, late, and very late postprocedural periods. Reference vessel diameter was the only lesion-related predictor of long-term TLF; clinical predictors were diabetes, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and prior PCI.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureAntineoplastic AgentsCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimusPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID31132582
PMCPMC7051011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.