ArticleContraception2019
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.
Article in Contraception, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contraceptive Counseling: Construction and Validation of Instrument-"5C Contraceptive Counseling".Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Patient and counselor satisfaction with structured contraceptive counseling by health center staff in federally qualified health centers.Contraception · 2021Article
- Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.Preventive medicine · 2020Article
- Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare unintended pregnancy rates at 12 months between women receiving structured contraceptive counseling plus usual contraceptive care and women receiving structured contraceptive counseling, healthcare provider education and cost support for long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods. STUDY
designUsing a controlled time-trend study design, we first enrolled 502 women receiving structured contraceptive counseling in addition to usual care ("Enhanced Care") and subsequently enrolled 506 women receiving counseling plus healthcare provider education and cost support for LARC methods ("Complete CHOICE") at three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Cost support included funds to health centers for "on-the-shelf" LARC methods and no-cost LARC methods for uninsured women. Participants completed in-person baseline surveys and follow-up surveys by telephone at 3, 6 and 12 months. We used Kaplan-Meier survival function to estimate 12-month unintended pregnancy rates and Cox proportional-hazards regression to compare unintended pregnancy rates between the two groups. We imputed pregnancy outcomes for women lost to follow-up (9%) prior to 12 months.
results"Complete CHOICE" participants were less likely to report an unintended pregnancy at 12 months compared to "Enhanced Care"; 5.3 vs. 9.8 pregnancies per 100 women-years (p=.01). After adjusting for confounders (recruitment site, race, age and federal poverty level), women in "Complete CHOICE" had a 40% lower risk of unintended pregnancy at 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.99).
conclusionsContraceptive provision that includes cost support and healthcare provider education in addition to patient counseling reduced unintended pregnancy at 12 months compared to counseling plus usual contraceptive care. IMPLICATIONS: A program of contraceptive care that includes comprehensive counseling; healthcare provider education; cost support; and on-the-shelf, long-acting reversible contraception can reduce unintended pregnancy compared to contraceptive counseling in addition to usual health center care in the FQHC setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.