ReviewHuman mutation2019
Single-nucleotide editing: From principle, optimization to application.
Review in Human mutation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beneficial bystander-enhanced cryptic splice rescue of cardiac-type Fabry GLA IVS4+919G>A by adenine base editing in patient fibroblasts.Gene therapy · 2026Article
- Functional effects of EpCAM N-glycosylation in MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and application of synthetic biology tools for improved production of human breast milk components.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial base editing: from principle, optimization to application.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- Delivering the Promise of Gene Therapy with Nanomedicines in Treating Central Nervous System Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Article
- Cytosine Base Editor-Mediated Multiplex Genome Editing to Accelerate Discovery of Novel Antibiotics inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Gene therapy for inherited arrhythmias.Cardiovascular research · 2020Review
- BEON: A Functional Fluorescence Reporter for Quantification and Enrichment of Adenine Base-Editing Activity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs), which are generally composed of an engineered deaminase and a catalytically impaired CRISPR-Cas9 variant, are new favorite tools for single base substitution in cells and organisms. In this review, we summarize the principle of base-editing systems and elaborate on the evolution of different platforms of CBEs and ABEs, including their deaminase, Cas9 variants, and editing outcomes. Moreover, we highlight their applications in mouse and human cells and discuss the challenges and prospects of base editors. The ABE- and CBE systems have been used in gene silencing, pathogenic gene correction, and functional genetic screening. Single base editing is becoming a new promising genetic tool in biomedical research and gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.