Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131901›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Ultra-low-dose PET reconstruction using generative adversarial network with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss.

Jiahong Ouyang, Kevin T Chen, Enhao Gong, John Pauly, Greg Zaharchuk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 85 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Unified Noise-aware Network for Low-count PET Denoising with Varying Count Levels.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiahong OuyangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Kevin T ChenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Enhao GongSubtle Medical, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
John PaulyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Greg ZaharchukDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015891 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GLOVER, GARY H · 2012 to 2019
$10.7M
Working Memory in Parkinson Disease: A Cognitive & Systems Neuroscience ApproachP50AG047366 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HENDERSON, VICTOR · 2015 to 2019
$7.9M
CoreFoundation of the American Society of NeuroradiologyGE HealthcareMichael J. Fox FoundationNIA NIH HHS P50 AG047366NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur goal was to use a generative adversarial network (GAN) with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss to synthesize standard-dose amyloid Positron emission tomography (PET) images of high quality and including accurate pathological features from ultra-low-dose PET images only.

methodsForty PET datasets from 39 participants were acquired with a simultaneous PET/MRI scanner following injection of 330 ± 30 MBq of the amyloid radiotracer 18F-florbetaben. The raw list-mode PET data were reconstructed as the standard-dose ground truth and were randomly undersampled by a factor of 100 to reconstruct 1% low-dose PET scans. A 2D encoder-decoder network was implemented as the generator to synthesize a standard-dose image and a discriminator was used to evaluate them. The two networks contested with each other to achieve high-visual quality PET from the ultra-low-dose PET. Multi-slice inputs were used to reduce noise by providing the network with 2.5D information. Feature matching was applied to reduce hallucinated structures. Task-specific perceptual loss was designed to maintain the correct pathological features. The image quality was evaluated by peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), and root mean square error (RMSE) metrics with and without each of these modules. Two expert radiologists were asked to score image quality on a 5-point scale and identified the amyloid status (positive or negative).

resultsWith only low-dose PET as input, the proposed method significantly outperformed Chen et al.'s method (Chen et al. Radiology. 2018;290:649-656) (which shows the best performance in this task) with the same input (PET-only model) by 1.87 dB in PSNR, 2.04% in SSIM, and 24.75% in RMSE. It also achieved comparable results to Chen et al.'s method which used additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inputs (PET-MR model). Experts' reading results showed that the proposed method could achieve better overall image quality and maintain better pathological features indicating amyloid status than both PET-only and PET-MR models proposed by Chen et al.

conclusionStandard-dose amyloid PET images can be synthesized from ultra-low-dose images using GAN. Applying adversarial learning, feature matching, and task-specific perceptual loss are essential to ensure image quality and the preservation of pathological features.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation DosageImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise Ratiodeep learningGANultra-low-dose PET reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID31131901
PMCPMC6692211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.