Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131356›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2019

Current status of postoperative infections after digestive surgery in Japan: The Japan Postoperative Infectious Complications Survey in 2015.

Toru Niitsuma, Shinya Kusachi, Yoshio Takesue, Hiroshige Mikamo, Koji Asai, Manabu Watanabe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Association Preoperative Protein Adequacy and Post Elective Laparotomy Surgical Site Infection.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toru NiitsumaDepartment of Surgery Toho University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-0245
Shinya KusachiDepartment of Surgery Toho University Ohashi Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Yoshio TakesueDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control Hyogo College of Medicine Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8635-6416
Hiroshige MikamoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases Aichi Medical University Aichi Japan.
Koji AsaiDepartment of Surgery Toho University Ohashi Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Manabu WatanabeDepartment of Surgery Toho University Ohashi Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Toho University · JPAichi Medical University · JPHyogo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo survey postoperative infections (PI) after digestive surgery.

methodsThis survey, conducted by the Japan Society of Surgical Infection, included patients undergoing digestive surgery at 28 centers between September 2015 and March 2016. Data collected included patient background characteristics, type of surgery, contamination status, and type of PI, including surgical site infection (SSI), remote infection (RI), and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacterial infections and colonization.

resultsPostoperative infections occurred in 10.7% of 6582 patients who underwent digestive surgery (6.8% for endoscopic surgery and 18.7% for open surgery). SSI and RI, including respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, drain infection, and catheter-related bloodstream infection, occurred in 8.9% and 3.7% of patients, respectively. Among all PI, 13.2% were overlapping infections. The most common overlapping infections were incisional and organ/space SSI, which occurred in 4.2% of patients. AMR bacterial infections occurred in 1.2% of patients after digestive surgery and comprised 11.5% of all PI. Rate of AMR bacterial colonization after digestive surgery was only 0.3%.

conclusionPeriodic surveillance of PI, including AMR bacteria, is necessary for a detailed evaluation of nosocomial infections.

Indexed as

nosocomial infectionpostoperative infectionremote infectionsurgical site infectionsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31131356
PMCPMC6524110
OpenAlexW2921210021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.