Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131258›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

Human Beta Defensins and Cancer: Contradictions and Common Ground.

Santosh K Ghosh, Thomas S McCormick, Aaron Weinberg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pioneering Clinical Investigation: Beta Defensin Expression in Patients of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Oral Cavity as a Forward-Looking Validation for Molecular Treatment.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Human β-defensin-1 activates autophagy in human colon cancer cellsWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  16. Genetic Features of Tongue Cancer Recurrence in Young Adults.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Acute promyelocytic leukemia withOncology letters · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Santosh K GhoshBiological Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Thomas S McCormickBiological Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Aaron WeinbergBiological Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Proj. 4-The Genetic Variation of Innate Immune Genes w/Oral Manifestations of HIVP01DE019759 · NIDCR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANCE, MARK R · 2009 to 2013
$9.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS P01 DE019759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human beta-defensins (hBDs, -1, 2, 3) are a family of epithelial cell derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that protect mucosal membranes from microbial challenges. In addition to their antimicrobial activities, they possess other functions; e.g., cell activation, proliferation, regulation of cytokine/chemokine production, migration, differentiation, angiogenesis, and wound healing processes. It has also become apparent that defensin levels change with the development of neoplasia. However, inconsistent observations published by various laboratories make it difficult to reach a consensus as to the direction of the dysregulation and role the hBDs may play in various cancers. This is particularly evident in studies focusing on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). By segregating each hBD by cancer type, interrogating methodologies, and scrutinizing the subject cohorts used in the studies, we have endeavored to identify the "take home message" for each one of the three hBDs. We discovered that (1) consensus-driven findings indicate that hBD-1 and-2 are down- while hBD-3 is up-regulated in OSCC; (2) hBD dysregulation is cancer-type specific; (3) the inhibition/activation effect an hBD has on cancer cell lines is related to the direction of the hBD dysregulation (up or down) in the cancer from which the cell lines derive. Therefore, studies addressing hBD dysregulation in various cancers are not generalizable and comparisons should be avoided. Systematic delineation of the fate and role of the hBDs in a specific cancer type may lead to innovative ways to use defensins as prospective biomarkers for diagnostic/prognostic purposes and/or in novel therapeutic modalities.

Indexed as

cancerhBD-1hBD-2hBD-3migrationproliferation

Identifiers

PMID31131258
PMCPMC6509205
OpenAlexW2943554879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.