ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2019
Disparate expression of autophagy in corneas of C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c mice after
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autophagy modulation in animal models of corneal diseases: a systematic review.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2020Pooled it
- The Role of LC3-Associated Phagocytosis Inhibits the Inflammatory Response in Aspergillus fumigatus Keratitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- The protein kinase R modifies gut physiology to limit colitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- The roles of autophagy and mitophagy in corneal pathology: current knowledge and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Autophagy in the normal and diseased cornea.Experimental eye research · 2022Review
- Review
- Biologically active pigment and ShlA cytolysin of Serratia marcescens induce autophagy in a human ocular surface cell line.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the disparate expression of autophagy in the
methodsC57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were used to establish fungal keratitis models. Disease severity and inflammatory response were observed by slit lamp microscopy in
resultsKeratitis severity was higher in C57BL/6 mice versus BALB/c mice at 1, 3 and 5d p.i. H&E staining showed that the number of inflammatory cells was larger and the severity of ulcer was higher in C57BL/6 mice than in BALB/c mice after stimulation with
conclusionThe expression of autophagy is higher in corneas of C57BL/6 mice than in BALB/c mice after
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.