Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2019

Anterior Column Realignment (ACR) With and Without Pre-ACR Posterior Release for Fixed Sagittal Deformity.

Jeffrey M Hills, S Tim Yoon, John M Rhee, Dheera Ananthakrishnan, Elliot Kim, Keith W Michael, Byron Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Moderate sagittal plane deformity patients have similar radiographic and functional outcomes with either anterior or posterior surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeffrey M HillsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
S Tim YoonEmory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
John M RheeEmory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dheera AnanthakrishnanEmory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Elliot KimEmory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Keith W MichaelEmory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Byron StephensDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between sagittal malalignment and health-related quality of life measures. Thus, correction of sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis-pelvic incidence (LL-PI), and T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPi) have become a primary objective of adult spinal deformity surgery. Anterior column realignment (ACR) has emerged as a less invasive technique and while the addition of posterior osteotomies has shown greater correction in ACR, it is unknown if a pre-ACR posterior release is necessary for optimal correction. The purpose of this study was to determine if pre-ACR posterior release allows for greater sagittal deformity correction.

methodsSeventeen patients were identified that underwent minimum 1-level ACR. Ten patients underwent an anterior-posterior surgical sequence without a pre-ACR posterior release, and 7 underwent a posterior-anterior-posterior (PAP) sequence with a pre-ACR posterior release. Radiographic outcomes at final follow-up and complications were compared.

resultsBoth groups saw significant improvements in LL, LL-PI, PT, SVA, and T1SPi but the correction was not significantly different between cohorts. With the exception of PT in the PAP group, the improvements in LL-PI, PT, and SVA correlated to improvement in Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification. The correction achieved at the ACR level, represented by motion segment angle, was greater in the PAP group by a degree that approached statistical significance. Five patients (29%) had 6 complications.

conclusionsBoth techniques achieved meaningful improvements in overall sagittal alignment. Our results suggest that a pre-ACR posterior release may allow for greater correction specifically at the ACR level but may not always be necessary to achieve clinically meaningful correction of sagittal plane deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We present our experience with and without pre-ACR posterior release. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that pre-ACR posterior release may achieve greater correction at the ACR level.

Indexed as

anterior column realignmentdeformitysagittal correctionsagittal malalignmentspine

Identifiers

PMID31131220
PMCPMC6510191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.