Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131169›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Current State of Point-of-care Ultrasound Usage in Canadian Emergency Departments.

Mason Leschyna, Erfun Hatam, Samantha Britton, Frank Myslik, Drew Thompson, Robert Sedran, Kristine VanAarsen, Sarah Detombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What is new in pleural infections?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The utilisation of emergency point-of-care ultrasound in a tertiary hospital emergency department in East London, South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Use of point-of-care ultrasound in rural British Columbia: Scale, training, and barriers.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current use and perceived barriers of emergency point-of-care ultrasound by African health care practitioners.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The utility of point of care ultrasonography (POCUS).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mason LeschynaFamily Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Erfun HatamEmergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Samantha BrittonFamily Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.
Frank MyslikEmergency Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Drew ThompsonEmergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Robert SedranEmergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Kristine VanAarsenEmergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Sarah DetombeEmergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has many applications in emergency medicine, which have been proven to improve patient outcomes. Training programs and well-established guidelines for its use are available, but Canadian adoption rates and attitudes toward this technology have not been recently assessed. Objectives This study aimed to provide a national assessment of the current use of POCUS in Canadian emergency departments (ED) including patterns of use, attitudes towards its role, descriptors of training experience, as well as barriers to increased utilization. Methods An electronic survey was sent to physician members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. The survey included questions related to demographics, attitudes towards POCUS, POCUS utilization, and barriers to POCUS use. Responses were statistically analyzed to identify significant associations. Results Responses demonstrated a strong association between POCUS training and amount of POCUS usage. Neither hospital type nor community type was associated with the degree of POCUS usage. POCUS was most widely adopted for Canadian Point of Care Ultrasound Society (CPOCUS) core applications and has increased since the last national survey. The most commonly reported barrier to increased POCUS adoption was the lack of training. Most physicians have formal POCUS training in core applications, and approximately one third have advanced training. Conclusions POCUS training and utilization appear to have increased since the last national assessment. This provides a foundation for future POCUS research.

Indexed as

emergency medicinepocuspoint of care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31131169
PMCPMC6516619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.