ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2019
Effect of fingolimod on white blood cell, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts in MS patients.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- NPC1 deficiency engages a lysosome-genome-immune program linked to neurodegeneration and cellular aging signatures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Discovery of In Vivo Active Sphingosine-1-phosphate Transporter (Spns2) Inhibitors.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- The emerging role of neutrophils in autoimmune-associated disorders: effector, predictor, and therapeutic targets.MedComm · 2021Review
- Alcohol and multiple sclerosis: an immune system-based review.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2019-10-15Ethical Violations by Author · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFingolimod is an immunomodulating oral treatment used for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The exact mechanism for its action in preventing relapses is unknown. Also, its affect on immune cell populations remains unestablished.
objectivesThis study will measure the changes in cell populations of WBCs, lymphocytes, and neutrophils in MS patients after one month of treatment.
methods66 MS patients from Isfahan Province with RRMS were chosen based on certain exclusion criteria and eligibility for fingolimod oral treatment. Initial cell counts for WBC, lymphocyte, and neutrophil cell populations were achieved. Fingolimod .5 mg daily treatment was then initiated under the supervision of a physician. After one month of treatment, cell counts were repeated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.
resultsBoth lymphocyte and WBC mean cell counts were significantly decreased in this patient cohort. Neutrophil average cell counts were significantly increased in this 66 patient cohort. Only the decrease of WBC populations was significant for both male and female cohorts individually. Only female sub-cohorts were significantly changed for neutrophils and lymphocytes, increased and decreased respectively. Male sub-cohorts maintained the same directionality but failed to produce statistical significance.
conclusionWhile fingolimod has been effectively proven as reducing lymphocyte cells in most patient populations, its effects on neutrophils have not been studied in abundance. Also, there may be sex-related differences in responses to fingolimod treatment with regards to lymphocytes and neutrophils, suggesting a possible difference in RRMS pathogenesis between males and females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31131156PMC6526352W2980409798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.