ArticleJournal of biometrics & biostatistics2018
Deep Learning Methods for Predicting Disease Status Using Genomic Data.
Article in Journal of biometrics & biostatistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- WDCN: a comprehensive neural network based approach for estimating breast cancer risk.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- AI, agentic models and lab automation for scientific discovery - the beginning of scAInce.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Etiology of Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease, Biomarker Efficacy, and the Role of Machine Learning in Stage Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Disease Prediction Using Graph Machine Learning Based on Electronic Health Data: A Review of Approaches and Trends.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Explanations of Black-Box Models based on Directional Feature Interactions.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2022Article
- An energy-efficient in-memory computing architecture for survival data analysis based on resistive switching memories.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Risk prediction for malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: logistic regression versus machine learning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Epigenetics Analysis and Integrated Analysis of Multiomics Data, Including Epigenetic Data, Using Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Precision Medicine.Biomolecules · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting disease status for a complex human disease using genomic data is an important, yet challenging, step in personalized medicine. Among many challenges, the so-called curse of dimensionality problem results in unsatisfied performances of many state-of-art machine learning algorithms. A major recent advance in machine learning is the rapid development of deep learning algorithms that can efficiently extract meaningful features from high-dimensional and complex datasets through a stacked and hierarchical learning process. Deep learning has shown breakthrough performance in several areas including image recognition, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the performance of deep learning in predicting disease status using genomic datasets is still not well studied. In this article, we performed a review on the four relevant articles that we found through our thorough literature search. All four articles first used auto-encoders to project high-dimensional genomic data to a low dimensional space and then applied the state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to predict disease status based on the low-dimensional representations. These deep learning approaches outperformed existing prediction methods, such as prediction based on transcript-wise screening and prediction based on principal component analysis. The limitations of the current deep learning approach and possible improvements were also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31131151PMC6530791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.