Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131144›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2019

Health Information Technology Trends in Social Media: Using Twitter Data.

Jisan Lee, Jeongeun Kim, Yeong Joo Hong, Meihua Piao, Ahjung Byun, Healim Song, Hyeong Suk Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Analysis of Telehealth Discussion Trends on Reddit (2019-2022).Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sentiment and emotion trends in nurses' tweets about the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jisan LeeDepartment of Nursing Science, College of Life & Health Sciences, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-7448
Jeongeun KimCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-9908
Yeong Joo HongCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-9532
Meihua PiaoCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-2908
Ahjung ByunCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-1527
Healim SongMedical Intensive Care Unit, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5632-9735
Hyeong Suk LeeCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7597-3163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study analyzed the health technology trends and sentiments of users using Twitter data in an attempt to examine the public's opinions and identify their needs.

methodsTwitter data related to health technology, from January 2010 to October 2016, were collected. An ontology related to health technology was developed. Frequently occurring keywords were analyzed and visualized with the word cloud technique. The keywords were then reclassified and analyzed using the developed ontology and sentiment dictionary. Python and the R program were used for crawling, natural language processing, and sentiment analysis.

resultsIn the developed ontology, the keywords are divided into 'health technology' and 'health information'. Under health technology, there are are six subcategories, namely, health technology, wearable technology, biotechnology, mobile health, medical technology, and telemedicine. Under health information, there are four subcategories, namely, health information, privacy, clinical informatics, and consumer health informatics. The number of tweets about health technology has consistently increased since 2010; the number of posts in 2014 was double that in 2010, which was about 150 thousand posts. Posts about mHealth accounted for the majority, and the dominant words were 'care', 'new', 'mental', and 'fitness'. Sentiment analysis by subcategory showed that most of the posts in nearly all subcategories had a positive tone with a positive score.

conclusionsInterests in mHealth have risen recently, and consequently, posts about mHealth were the most frequent. Examining social media users' responses to new health technology can be a useful method to understand the trends in rapidly evolving fields.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformaticsData MiningNatural Language ProcessingPublic OpinionSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID31131144
PMCPMC6517632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.