Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131109›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2019

The wind changed direction and the big river still flows: from EUPHRATES to TIGRIS.

Toshiaki Iba, David J Klein

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04884854 (Early Efferon LPS Hemoperfusion Through Hypercrosslinked Styrene-divinylbenzene Copolymer With Immobilized LPS-selective Ligand for Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04884854 completednot on this map

Early Efferon LPS Hemoperfusion Through Hypercrosslinked Styrene-divinylbenzene Copolymer With Immobilized LPS-selective Ligand for Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock

TypeobservationalSponsorEfferon JSCRan2019 to 2020Enrolled9ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsEfferon LPS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toshiaki Iba1Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-4088
David J Klein2Department of Critical Care, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall result of the randomized controlled double-blinded trial for polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column on septic shock (EUPHRATES trial) was disappointing. However, post hoc analysis showed benefits for patients with certain Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) levels. Thus, the study will be repeated, and the data will be added to the former trial. Using a precision medicine approach, eligibility criteria have been modified in TIGRIS to include patients with MODS score > 9 and EAA levels between 0.60 and 0.89. We are currently feeling the change in the wind as the rivers continue to flow towards PMX therapy for endotoxemic septic shock.

Indexed as

Endotoxin activity assayPolymyxin B-immobilized fiber columnRandomized controlled trialSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID31131109
PMCPMC6521478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.