Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31131009›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2019

Effects of copaiba oil on dermonecrosis induced by

Mara Fernandes Ribeiro, Felipe Leite de Oliveira, Aline Moreira Souza, Thelma de Barros Machado, Priscilla Farinhas Cardoso, Andrea Patti, Angélica Silveira Nascimento, Cláudio Maurício Vieira de Souza, Sabrina Calil Elias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the effects ofToxicology reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Mara Fernandes RibeiroLaboratory of Pharmacology; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Administration; School of Pharmacy; Fluminense Federal University; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-425X
Felipe Leite de OliveiraLaboratory for Cellular Proliferation and Differentiation; Institute of Biomedical Sciences; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Aline Moreira SouzaLaboratory for Veterinary Clinical Pathology; Department of Pathology and Veterinary Clinics; School of Veterinary Medicine; Fluminense Federal University; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Thelma de Barros MachadoLaboratory of Physiochemical Quality Control; Department of Pharmaceutical Technology; School of Pharmacy; Fluminense Federal University; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Priscilla Farinhas CardosoLaboratory of Arthropods; Scientific Directorship; Vital Brazil Institute; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Andrea PattiBiotherium; Scientific Directorship; Vital Brazil Institute; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Angélica Silveira NascimentoLaboratory of Pharmacology; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Administration; School of Pharmacy; Fluminense Federal University; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Cláudio Maurício Vieira de SouzaLaboratory of Arthropods; Scientific Directorship; Vital Brazil Institute; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Sabrina Calil EliasLaboratory of Pharmacology; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Administration; School of Pharmacy; Fluminense Federal University; Niterói - RJ, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccidents caused by spiders of the genus

methodsCutaneous lesions were induced on the backs of rabbits by intradermal injection of

resultsCompared to the control group, the platelet count was reduced significantly in all groups inoculated with venom, accompanied by a decreased number of heterophils in the blood. The minimum necrotic dose (MND) was defined as 2.4 μg/kg. Topical treatment with copaiba oil demonstrated a differentiated healing profile: large skin lesions were observed 10 days after venom inoculation, whereas formation of a thick crust, without scarring was observed 30 days after venom inoculation. Histopathological analysis showed no significant difference after treatment. Nevertheless, the copaiba oil treatment induced a collagen distribution similar to control skin, in marked contrast to the group that received only the spider venom injection.

conclusionsWe conclude that copaiba oil may interfere in the healing process and thus propose it as a possible topical treatment for cutaneous lesions induced by

Indexed as

copaiba oilLoxosceles intermediaskin lesiontopical treatmentvenom

Identifiers

PMID31131009
PMCPMC6521710
OpenAlexW2943135140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.