Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31130970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

A Combined Phenotypic and Metabolomic Approach for Elucidating the Biostimulant Action of a Plant-Derived Protein Hydrolysate on Tomato Grown Under Limited Water Availability.

Kenny Paul, Mirella Sorrentino, Luigi Lucini, Youssef Rouphael, Mariateresa Cardarelli, Paolo Bonini, Maria Begoña Miras Moreno, Hélène Reynaud, Renaud Canaguier, Martin Trtílek and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Do plant biostimulants affect the survival ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kenny PaulPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s.r.o., Drásov, Czechia.
Mirella SorrentinoPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s.r.o., Drásov, Czechia.
Luigi LuciniDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Research Centre for Nutrigenomics and Proteomics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Youssef RouphaelDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Mariateresa CardarelliConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Orticoltura e Florovivaismo, Pontecagnano Faiano, Italy.
Paolo BoniniNGAlab, Tarragona, Spain.
Maria Begoña Miras MorenoDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Research Centre for Nutrigenomics and Proteomics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Hélène ReynaudItalpollina USA, Inc., Anderson, IN, United States.
Renaud CanaguierNixe, Valbonne, France.
Martin TrtílekPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s.r.o., Drásov, Czechia.
Klára PanzarováPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s.r.o., Drásov, Czechia.
Giuseppe CollaDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy.
Photon Systems Instruments (Czechia) · CZUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria · ITCoskata (United States) · USFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversità degli Studi della Tuscia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-derived protein hydrolysates (PHs) are an important category of biostimulants able to increase plant growth and crop yield especially under environmental stress conditions. PHs can be applied as foliar spray or soil drench. Foliar spray is generally applied to achieve a relatively short-term response, whereas soil drench is used when a long-term effect is desired. The aim of the study was to elucidate the biostimulant action of PH application method (foliar spray or substrate drench) on morpho-physiological traits and metabolic profile of tomato grown under limited water availability. An untreated control was also included. A high-throughput image-based phenotyping (HTP) approach was used to non-destructively monitor the crop response under limited water availability (40% of container capacity) in a controlled environment. Moreover, metabolic profile of leaves was determined at the end of the trial. Dry biomass of shoots at the end of the trial was significantly correlated with number of green pixels (

Indexed as

drench applicationfoliar sprayhigh-throughput phenotypingmetabolomicsmorpho-physiological traitsprotein hydrolysates

Identifiers

PMID31130970
PMCPMC6509618
OpenAlexW2943075991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.