ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2019
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADMETPred: a high-throughput ADMET prediction platform integrating multi-model algorithms and interpretable substructure identification.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Hepatotoxicity prediction for traditional Chinese medicine: a two-step in silico framework integrating network and machine learning approaches.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- The integration of machine learning into traditional Chinese medicine.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Emodin and physcion alleviate cholestatic liver injury by targeting FXR: hepatoprotective components identified in processedFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Application and research progress on artificial intelligence in the quality of Traditional Chinese Medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive applications of the artificial intelligence technology in new drug research and development.Health information science and systems · 2024Review
- Toxicity evaluation of processing Evodiae fructus based on intestinal microbiota.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Xiao-Yao-San protects against anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury by regulating Grsf1 in the mitochondrial oxidative stress pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- DenovoProfiling: A webserver forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Recognition Based on Target Detection.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Comparison of Descriptor- and Fingerprint Sets in Machine Learning Models for ADME-Tox Targets.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Chemical Distance Measurement and System Pharmacology Approach Uncover the Novel Protective Effects of Biotransformed Ginsenoside C-Mc against UVB-Irradiated Photoaging.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Comprehensive assessment of side effects in COVID-19 drug pipeline from a network perspective.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2020Article
- Systems pharmacology-based approach to investigate the mechanisms of Danggui-Shaoyao-san prescription for treatment of Alzheimer's disease.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- A Systems Pharmacology Approach for Identifying the Multiple Mechanisms of Action for the Rougui-Fuzi Herb Pair in the Treatment of Cardiocerebral Vascular Diseases.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- A Computational Toxicology Approach to Screen the Hepatotoxic Ingredients in Traditional Chinese Medicines:Biomolecules · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS AND
aimsRecently, a growing number of hepatotoxicity cases aroused by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) have been reported, causing increasing concern. To date, the reported predictive models for drug induced liver injury show low prediction accuracy and there are still no related reports for hepatotoxicity evaluation of TCM systematically. Additionally, the mechanism of herb induced liver injury (HILI) still remains unknown. The aim of the study was to identify potential hepatotoxic ingredients in TCM and explore the molecular mechanism of TCM against HILI. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, we developed consensus models for HILI prediction by integrating the best single classifiers. The consensus model with best performance was applied to identify the potential hepatotoxic ingredients from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology database (TCMSP). Systems pharmacology analyses, including multiple network construction and KEGG pathway enrichment, were performed to further explore the hepatotoxicity mechanism of TCM.
results16 single classifiers were built by combining four machine learning methods with four different sets of fingerprints. After systematic evaluation, the best four single classifiers were selected, which achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) value of 0.702, 0.691, 0.659, and 0.717, respectively. To improve the predictive capacity of single models, consensus prediction method was used to integrate the best four single classifiers. Results showed that the consensus model C-3 (MCC = 0.78) outperformed the four single classifiers and other consensus models. Subsequently, 5,666 potential hepatotoxic compounds were identified by C-3 model. We integrated the top 10 hepatotoxic herbs and discussed the hepatotoxicity mechanism of TCM via systems pharmacology approach. Finally,
conclusionOverall, this study provides a high accurate approach to predict HILI and an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.