Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31130827›Full record

ArticleAddictive disorders & their treatment2019

Intensive Motivational Interviewing for Heavy Drinking among Women.

Douglas Polcin, Rachael A Korcha, Sheila Pugh, Jane Witbrodt, Michelle Salinardi, Gantt Galloway, Madhabika B Nayak, Emily Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive disorders & their treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas PolcinPublic Health Institute.
Rachael A KorchaPublic Health Institute.
Sheila PughPublic Health Institute.
Jane WitbrodtPublic Health Institute.
Michelle SalinardiPublic Health Institute.
Gantt GallowayFriends Research Institute.
Madhabika B NayakPublic Health Institute.
Emily NelsonPublic Health Institute.
Public Health Institute · USFriends Research Institute · US

Funding

Randomized Trial of Intensive MI to Improve Drinking Outcomes Among WomenR01AA022857 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI POLCIN, DOUGLAS L · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWomen suffer more severe consequences related to heavy drinking than men. Relative to men, women who are heavy drinkers experience higher severity of medical, psychiatric, and social problems, even when they have fewer years drinking. Currently there are few gender-specific, evidence-based interventions for heavy drinking among women.

methodsA randomized clinical trial was conducted with 215 women with alcohol problems. Half were randomly assigned to receive a 9-session, "Intensive Motivational Interviewing" (IMI) intervention (N=107) and half were randomly assigned to a standard single session of MI (SMI) along with 8 sessions of nutritional education (N=108) to achieve time equivalence. Both conditions received weekly outpatient group counseling. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 2 months. Primary outcomes included percent drinking days (PDD), percent heavy drinking days (PHDD, 4+ drinks), and the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Alcohol scale. Longitudinal changes were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE).

resultsThe sample was predominantly white (83.3

conclusionsFindings support the efficacy of IMI for heavy drinking among women. Additional studies are needed that assess drinking over longer time periods.

Indexed as

Alcoholheavy drinkingIntensive Motivational InterviewingMotivational InterviewingWomen

Identifiers

PMID31130827
PMCPMC6530935
OpenAlexW2808041986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.