Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31130786›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2019

Impact of Implementing the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool on Nurses' Performance in Assessing and Managing Pain in the Critically Ill Patients.

Mahnaz Modanloo, Afsaneh Mohsenpour, Hossein Rahmani, Shahram Moghaddam, Homeira Khoddam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Frailty in the cardiac intensive care unit: assessment and impact.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ignorance may be Bliss (for Intensivists), but not for ICU Patients!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahnaz ModanlooNursing Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Afsaneh MohsenpourCritical Care Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Hossein RahmaniNursing Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Shahram MoghaddamDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Homeira KhoddamNursing Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Golestan University · IRGolestan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPain management is one of the most important responsibilities of nurses in an intensive care unit (ICU). It is difficult to perform pain assessment appropriately in patients who are unable to report their pain. This study is aimed to determine the impact of implementing the critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) on the amount and frequency of analgesics' administration in ICUs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis interventional study was conducted in 2014. Sixty nurses and 240 patients were studied. This study was carried out in three phases: first the data about amount and frequency of analgesic administration were extracted from patients' medical files. Then the CPOT was implemented into the nursing assessment process and finally, nurses' performance regarding the amount and frequency of analgesic administration was recorded. This data obtained before and after intervention were analyzed using chi-square and independent t-test

resultsIn this interventional study, we found that there was no difference in the demography and cause of ICU admission before and after implementation of CPOT (age

conclusionApplying CPOT, as an objective mean of pain assessment, was effective in improving the performance of ICU nurses in assessment and management of patients' pain. It increased the amount and frequency of analgesic administration. We can recommend that COPT is a useful tool for assessment and management of pain in ICU patients and should be implemented in all ICUs. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Modanloo M, Mohsenpour A,

Indexed as

Analgesic administrationCritical care pain observation toolIntensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID31130786
PMCPMC6521825
OpenAlexW2973027784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.