Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31130627›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2019

Risk Factors for Development of Canine and Human Osteosarcoma: A Comparative Review.

Kelly M Makielski, Lauren J Mills, Aaron L Sarver, Michael S Henson, Logan G Spector, Shruthi Naik, Jaime F Modiano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Large-Scale Comparative Analysis of Canine and Human Osteosarcomas Uncovers Conserved Clinically Relevant Tumor Microenvironment Subtypes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly M MakielskiAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. makie001@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7878-2370
Lauren J MillsAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. ljmills@umn.edu.
Aaron L SarverAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. sarver@umn.edu.
Michael S HensonAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. henso001@umn.edu.
Logan G SpectorAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. spect012@umn.edu.
Shruthi NaikDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. naik.shruthi@mayo.edu.
Jaime F ModianoAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. modiano@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-7648
University of Minnesota · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
Bioinformatics approaches to solve the "Missing Driver" problem in solid tumorsR50CA211249 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SARVER, AARON L · 2016 to 2020
$565k
Children's Cancer Research Fund Zach Sobiech Osteosarcoma FundNCI NIH HHS R50 CA211249NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138NIH HHS T32 CA009138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary tumor of bone. Osteosarcomas are rare in humans, but occur more commonly in dogs. A comparative approach to studying osteosarcoma has highlighted many clinical and biologic aspects of the disease that are similar between dogs and humans; however, important species-specific differences are becoming increasingly recognized. In this review, we describe risk factors for the development of osteosarcoma in dogs and humans, including height and body size, genetics, and conditions that increase turnover of bone-forming cells, underscoring the concept that stochastic mutational events associated with cellular replication are likely to be the major molecular drivers of this disease. We also discuss adaptive, cancer-protective traits that have evolved in large, long-lived mammals, and how increasing size and longevity in the absence of natural selection can account for the elevated bone cancer risk in modern domestic dogs.

Indexed as

bone cancercomparative oncologydoggeneticshumanosteosarcomapediatricrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31130627
PMCPMC6631450
OpenAlexW2946282606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.