Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31130258›Full record

ArticleVaccine2019

Supporting national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) in resource-constrained settings. New strategies and lessons learned from the Task Force for Global Health's Partnership for influenza vaccine introduction.

Antoinette Ba-Nguz, Adeel Shah, Joseph S Bresee, Kathryn E Lafond, Kathy Cavallaro, Abigail Shefer, Morgane Donadel, Jane F Seward

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoinette Ba-NguzTask Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Adeel ShahTask Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joseph S BreseeTask Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA. Electronic address: jsb6@cdc.gov.
Kathryn E LafondCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA.
Kathy CavallaroCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA.
Abigail SheferCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA.
Morgane DonadelCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA.
Jane F SewardTask Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USThe Task Force for Global Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are multidisciplinary national experts who provide independent, evidence-informed vaccine policy recommendations to national health authorities. An essential NITAG function is to ensure that these decisions are grounded in the best available evidence generated through a systematic, transparent process. However, in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), experience with this decision making method is limited. The Task Force for Global Health manages the Partnership for Influenza Vaccine Introduction (PIVI) program in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministries of Health, corporate partners and others. During 2017, PIVI worked with its country partners and the World Health Organization regional and local offices to assess NITAG strengthening needs and to provide technical assistance in 7 LMIC countries (Laos Peoples Democratic Republic, Mongolia, Vietnam, Armenia, Côte d'Ivoire; Moldova and the Republic of Georgia). Our workshops supported general NITAG capacity building and the evidence-based review process using vaccines of interest to the country. For NITAGs reviewing evidence on seasonal influenza, we developed an influenza resource package to support their review and provide country-relevant information in an easy to use format. Of the seven NITAGs trained, six have applied some of the concepts learnt: revision or development of formal transparent, systematic procedures for their operations; preparation of recommendations on seasonal influenza vaccination using quality-assessed data from systematic searches and local data; and have applied the principles learned for making other new vaccine recommendations. Our experience confirms that LMIC NITAGs are considerably under-resourced without adequate technical support or access to global peer-reviewed literature. Ongoing support from NITAG partners must be secured and creative approaches might be needed to help countries achieve the GVAP 2020 target and support development of sustainable vaccine policies and programs.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesDecision MakingGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHealth ResourcesHumansImmunizationImmunization ProgramsInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationWorld Health OrganizationInfluenza VaccinesEvidence-basedImmunizationLessonsNITAGPolicyRecommendationsResource-constrainedVaccine

Identifiers

PMID31130258
PMCPMC10236357
OpenAlexW2946369675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.