Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129982›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2020

Misclassification of sexual health risks in a self-identified low risk cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) enrolled in a community based PrEP program.

Kellie Freeborn, Carmen Portillo, Cherie B Boyer, Glen Milo Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Very High Incidence ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Assessing the Underestimation of HIV Risk Infection among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in Argentina.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kellie FreebornDivision of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-2249
Carmen PortilloSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cherie B BoyerSan Francisco Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Glen Milo SantosSchool of Nursing, Department of Community Health Systems, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-5317

Funding

HIV/AIDS NURSING CARE AND PREVENTIONT32NR007081 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DAWSON-ROSE, CAROL, VLAHOV, DAVID · 1995 to 2016
$3.8M
Risk Behavior Changes in the Era of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV.F31NR016179 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FREEBORN, KELLIE · 2016 to 2017
$64k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR016179NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CDC recommends PrEP for MSM at substantial risk of HIV acquisition, leaving clinicians unsure whether to prescribe PrEP to MSM who do not disclose HIV risk factors. A longitudinal cohort of MSM requesting PrEP despite reporting during a clinical visit either 100% condom use or participation in oral sex only and no other risk factors was followed over 13 months at a community clinic in San Francisco to assess the accuracy of their HIV risk perception. Participants completed a sexual and substance use behavior questionnaire at baseline, outside of the clinical visit and were followed by quarterly HIV/STI testing and condom use change questionnaires. Condomless sex increased from 0% at baseline to 12% at month 1, peaked at 34% at month 7, and then decreased again to 8% at month 13. Rates of pharyngeal GC/CT varied from 7% at baseline to 12% at month 13, while rectal GC/CT decreased from 6% at baseline to 0% at month 13. The rate of syphilis was 1% both at baseline and at month 13, however, 11% and 15% of clients tested positive for syphilis at months 1 and 7 respectively.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesCommunity Health ServicesCondomsHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPre-Exposure ProphylaxisRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSafe SexAnti-HIV AgentsMSMPrEPrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID31129982
PMCPMC6875612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.