Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129924›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2019

Increased frontal gray matter volume in individuals with prodromal psychosis.

Xiao-Xiao Shan, Yang-Pan Ou, Pan Pan, Yu-Dan Ding, Jin Zhao, Feng Liu, Jin-Dong Chen, Wen-Bin Guo, Jing-Ping Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dissociation between neuroanatomical and symptomatic subtypes in schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiao-Xiao ShanDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yang-Pan OuDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Pan PanDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yu-Dan DingDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jin ZhaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jin-Dong ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wen-Bin GuoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-2465
Jing-Ping ZhaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain anatomical deficits associated with cognitive dysfunction have been reported in patients with schizophrenia. However, it remains unknown whether such anatomical deficits exist in individuals with prodromal psychosis. The present study is designed to investigate anatomical deficits in prodromal individuals and their associations with clinical/cognitive features.

methodsSeventy-four prodromal individuals and seventy-six healthy controls were scanned using structural magnetic resonance imaging. Support vector machines were applied to test whether anatomical deficits might be used to discriminate prodromal individuals from healthy controls.

resultsProdromal individuals showed significantly increased gray matter volume (GMV) in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and right rectus gyrus relative to healthy controls. No correlations were observed between increased GMV and clinical/cognitive characteristics. The combination of increased GMV in the right rectus gyrus and right IFG showed a sensitivity of 74.32%, a specificity of 67.11%, and an accuracy of 70.67% in differentiating prodromal individuals from healthy controls.

conclusionOur results provide evidence of increased frontal GMV in prodromal individuals. A combination of GMV values in the two frontal brain areas may serve as potential markers to discriminate prodromal individuals from healthy controls. The results thus highlight the importance of the frontal regions in the pathophysiology of psychosis.

Indexed as

Prodromal SymptomsAdolescentAdultBrainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleOrgan SizePsychotic DisordersYoung Adultcognitive functiongray matter volumemagnetic resonance imagingprodromal psychosissupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID31129924
PMCPMC6698969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.