Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129859›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Deep transfer learning methods for colon cancer classification in confocal laser microscopy images.

Nils Gessert, Marcel Bengs, Lukas Wittig, Daniel Drömann, Tobias Keck, Alexander Schlaefer, David B Ellebrecht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep Learning in Biomedical Optics.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nils GessertInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany. nils.gessert@tuhh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-5092
Marcel BengsInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Lukas WittigDepartment of Pulmology, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Daniel DrömannDepartment of Pulmology, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Alexander SchlaeferInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
David B EllebrechtDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe gold standard for colorectal cancer metastases detection in the peritoneum is histological evaluation of a removed tissue sample. For feedback during interventions, real-time in vivo imaging with confocal laser microscopy has been proposed for differentiation of benign and malignant tissue by manual expert evaluation. Automatic image classification could improve the surgical workflow further by providing immediate feedback.

methodsWe analyze the feasibility of classifying tissue from confocal laser microscopy in the colon and peritoneum. For this purpose, we adopt both classical and state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks to directly learn from the images. As the available dataset is small, we investigate several transfer learning strategies including partial freezing variants and full fine-tuning. We address the distinction of different tissue types, as well as benign and malignant tissue.

resultsWe present a thorough analysis of transfer learning strategies for colorectal cancer with confocal laser microscopy. In the peritoneum, metastases are classified with an AUC of 97.1, and in the colon the primarius is classified with an AUC of 73.1. In general, transfer learning substantially improves performance over training from scratch. We find that the optimal transfer learning strategy differs for models and classification tasks.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that convolutional neural networks and transfer learning can be used to identify cancer tissue with confocal laser microscopy. We show that there is no generally optimal transfer learning strategy and model as well as task-specific engineering is required. Given the high performance for the peritoneum, even with a small dataset, application for intraoperative decision support could be feasible.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerColonic NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalNeoplasm MetastasisPeritoneal NeoplasmsColon cancerConfocal laser microscopyConvolution neural networkTransfer learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.