ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019
Therapeutic benefit of second-look transurethral resection of bladder tumors for newly diagnosed T1 bladder cancer: a single-center experience.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Safety and Efficacy of Vela Laser En-Bloc Endoscopic Resection versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor-A Single Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- When to Avoid a Restaging Procedure for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer? Inferences from a Tertiary Care Center.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT).Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn recent years, second-look transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) has been recommended for patients with stage T1 bladder cancer after the initial TURBT for restaging and deciding the subsequent treatment. However, we believe that second-look TURBT has therapeutic benefits, such as low incidence of recurrence and progression. Therefore, we compare the differences in long-term outcome between patients who did and did not accept second-look TURBT for stage T1 bladder cancer.
methodsWe assessed 504 patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma who underwent initial TURBT between January 2012 and December 2016 at a single medical center; of these patients, 177 were diagnosed with T1 bladder cancer during the initial TURBT, and we excluded no muscle from the specimen in the initial TURBT. The patients were categorized into groups 1 and 2 based on the acceptance of second-look TURBT, which was performed within 4-14 weeks after the initial TURBT. Group 1 underwent second-look TURBT, but group 2 did not. Both groups were followed-up for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the risk factors for recurrence and progression were analyzed.
resultsIn total, 93 (52.5%) patients in group 1 underwent second-look TURBT, and 84 (47.5%) in group 2 did not. The 2-year RFS rates were 74.6% and 60.0% and the PFS rates were 91.2% and 87.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively.
conclusionThis study demonstrated higher recurrence-free and progression-free survival rates for patients who underwent second-look TURBT. This result emphasizes the importance of second-look TURBT in stage T1 bladder cancer not only for restaging but also for therapeutic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31129781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.