ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2020
Fast prostate retrieval in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for next-generation biobanking.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive data analysis of genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics to identify specific biomolecular markers for prostate adenocarcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has become the most widespread treatment for organ-confined prostate cancer. Here, we describe a fast specimen retrieval technique for RALP to obtain high-quality tissue specimen with minimal warm ischemia time for next-generation biobanking. Here, we show that using fast retrieval technique, short warm ischemia times can be achieved while not increasing the surgical time. Patients undergoing RALP with written informed consent participated in Helsinki Urological Bank study. Previously operated RALP patients and those, who were not willing to participate in the study, served as a control group. The study consisted of 1685 patients, 684 in fast retrieval and 1001 in control group. We developed a novel fast retrieval technique in which fascia is opened for camera port according to the prostate size and a running suture is placed and tightened against the camera port in the beginning of the operation. Immediately after prostate is freed from attachments, suture is loosened and the prostate is extirpated inside the endoscopic bag through the camera port fascial opening, then the fascial suture is again tightened against the camera port and the RALP procedure is completed. The mean warm ischemia times in fast retrieval group were 20 min 18 s and 22 min 30 s, respectively, in patients without and with lymphadenectomy. The mean console and surgery times with and without lymphadenectomy were similar in both groups. There were no technique-related complications associated with Fast Retrieval procedure. Tissue integrity test results for the RNA and DNA quality showed good quality for the specimen. Fast retrieval technique can easily and safely be utilized to maximize usefulness of RALP tissue specimen in downstream biobank applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.