ArticleJournal of medical systems2019
A Pilot Study on Oocyte Retrieval Simulator: A New Tool for Training?
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of oocyte retrievals completed by reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellows versus faculty: a 7-year retrospective review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Self-made transvaginal ultrasound simulator: new training equipment in ultrasound evaluation of controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval.Journal of ultrasonography · 2023Article
- Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer.Human reproduction open · 2022Review
- Impact and Adaptation of Reproductive Training During COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2021Review
- Assessment of operator performance during oocyte retrievals: residents' learning curve and continuous monitoring of senior physicians.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- The Maribor consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of performance indicators for clinical practice in ART.Human reproduction open · 2021Article
- Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: oocyte pick upHuman reproduction open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective study was aimed at assessing the usefulness of a box simulator in oocyte pick-up and at establishing whether it could be an appropriate training tool for egg retrieval. Forty-four clinicians, divided in two groups on the grounds of the previous experience (Novices and Experts), participated to two training sessions with a pick-up simulator. Data concerning the mean number of follicles correctly aspired (%OK med), the average time needed to correctly aspirate one follicle (t foll med) and the ratio between the two afore-mentioned parameters (%OK med/t foll med) were collected. At the end of the two sessions all participants completed a questionnaire aimed at assessing the performance of the simulator in terms of realism and acceptability for use. A significant improvement in efficiency (mean number of follicles correctly aspired, 82% versus 75%), speed (mean time needed to aspirate one follicle, 21 versus 28 s) and accuracy (mean percentage of follicles correctly aspirated in one minute, 2.53% versus 1.86%) was noted in the total sample. The performance accuracy was significantly increased in both groups (2.34% versus 1.83% for Novices and 2.50% versus 2.06%, for Experts). Speed was significantly improved in the Novices' group. Simulator-based training has been shown to be effective and useful and it should be considered in training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31129724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.