Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129719›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2019

Nabilone for non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, enriched enrolment randomized withdrawal study (The NMS-Nab Study).

Marina Peball, Mario Werkmann, Philipp Ellmerer, Raphaela Stolz, Dora Valent, Hans-Günther Knaus, Hanno Ulmer, Atbin Djamshidian, Werner Poewe, Klaus Seppi

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Therapeutic use of medical Cannabis in neurological diseases: a clinical update.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina PeballDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Marina.peball@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-0791-7300
Mario WerkmannDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp EllmererDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Raphaela StolzDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dora ValentDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Hans-Günther KnausDepartment for Medical Genetics, Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Innsbruck Medical University, Peter-Mayr Straße 1, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Hanno UlmerDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Schöpfstraße 41/1, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Atbin DjamshidianDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Werner PoeweDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Klaus SeppiDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Klaus.Seppi@tirol-kliniken.at.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although open-label observations report a positive effect of cannabinoids on non-motor symptoms (NMS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, these effects remain to be investigated in a controlled trial for a broader use in NMS in PD patients. Therefore, we decided to design a proof-of-concept study to assess the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone for the treatment of NMS. We hypothesize that nabilone will improve NMS in patients with PD and have a favorable safety profile. The NMS-Nab Study is as a mono-centric phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, enriched enrollment withdrawal study. The primary efficacy criterion will be the change in Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale Part I score between baseline (i.e. randomization) and week 4. A total of 38 patients will have 80% power to detect a probability of 0.231 that an observation in the treatment group is less than an observation in the placebo group using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test with a 0.050 two-sided significance level assuming a true difference of 2.5 points between nabilone and placebo in the primary outcome measure and a standard deviation of the change of 2.4 points. The reduction of harm through an ineffective treatment, the possibility of individualized dosing, the reduction of sample size, and the possible evaluation of the influence of the placebo effect on efficacy outcomes justify this design for a single-centered placebo-controlled investigator-initiated trial of nabilone. This study should be the basis for further evaluations of long-term efficacy and safety of the use of cannabinoids in PD patients.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsClinical Trial Protocols as TopicDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolFemaleHumansMaleParkinson DiseasePatient SelectionProof of Concept StudyTreatment OutcomeAntiparkinson AgentsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinolnabiloneCannabinoidsNabiloneNon-motor symptomsParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID31129719
PMCPMC6647387
OpenAlexW2945362610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.