Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129697›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Meta-analysis of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection: the dilemma remains.

Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Diwakar Ryali Sarma, Jamie East, Shafquat Zaman, Rajnish Mankotia, Christopher Vaun Thompson, Andrew W Torrance, Rajeev Peravali

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shahin HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK. shahin_hajibandeh@yahoo.com.
Shahab HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Diwakar Ryali SarmaDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Jamie EastDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Shafquat ZamanDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Rajnish MankotiaDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Christopher Vaun ThompsonDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew W TorranceDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Rajeev PeravaliDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate comparative outcomes of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection.

methodsWe systematic searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov , ISRCTN Register and bibliographic reference lists. Overall perioperative complications, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, ileus and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome parameters. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed effects or random effects models.

resultsWe identified 4 studies reporting a total of 436 patients comparing outcomes of temporary loop ileostomy closure during (n = 185) or after (n = 251) adjuvant chemotherapy following colorectal cancer resection. There was no significant difference in overall perioperative complications (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.82-2.36, p = 0.22), anastomotic leak (OR 2.80; 95% CI 0.47-16.56, p = 0.26), surgical site infection (OR 1.97; 95% CI 0.80-4.90, p = 0.14), ileus (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.50-2.96, p = 0.66) or length of hospital stay (MD 0.02; 95% CI - 0.85-0.89, p = 0.97) between two groups. Between-study heterogeneity was low in all analyses.

conclusionsThe meta-analysis of the best, albeit limited, available evidence suggests that temporary loop ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection may be associated with comparable outcomes to the closure of ileostomy after adjuvant chemotherapy. We encourage future research to concentrate on the completeness of chemotherapy and quality of life which can determine the appropriateness of either approach.

Indexed as

IleostomyAgedAnastomotic LeakChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansIleusLength of StayMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsSurgical Wound InfectionLoop ileostomy closureStoma reversal, adjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.