Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129661›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of nephrology2019

The Prevalence of Intradialytic Hypotension in Patients on Conventional Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Johanna Kuipers, Loes M Verboom, Karin J R Ipema, Wolter Paans, Wim P Krijnen, Carlo A J M Gaillard, Ralf Westerhuis, Casper F M Franssen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05052151 (Hemodynamic Effects of Low vs. High Dialysate Temperature or Bicarbonate Concentration in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05052151 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Hemodynamic Effects of Low vs. High Dialysate Temperature or Bicarbonate Concentration in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2021 to 2022Enrolled16ConditionsEnd Stage Renal Disease on DialysisArmsLow dialysate temperature, High dialysate temperature, Low dialysate bicarbonate concentration, High dialysate bicarbonate concentration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johanna KuipersDialysis Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, h.kuipers@dcg.nl.
Loes M VerboomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Karin J R IpemaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wolter PaansHanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wim P KrijnenHanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carlo A J M GaillardDivision of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ralf WesterhuisDialysis Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Casper F M FranssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntradialytic hypotension (IDH) is considered to be a frequent complication of hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with symptom burden, increased incidence of access failure, cardiovascular events, and higher mortality. This systematic literature review aims to analyse studies that investigated the prevalence of IDH. A complicating factor herein is that many different definitions of IDH are used in literature.

methodsA systematic literature search from databases, Medline, Cinahl, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library to identify studies reporting on the actual prevalence of IDH was conducted. Studies were categorized by the type of definition used for the prevalence of IDH. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of IDH was performed.

resultsIn a meta-analysis comprising 4 studies including 1,694 patients and 4 studies including 13,189 patients, the prevalence of HD sessions complicated by IDH was 10.1 and 11.6% for the European Best Practice Guideline (EBPG) definition and the Nadir <90 definition, respectively. The proportion of patients with frequent IDH could not reliably be established because of the wide range in cutoff values that were used to identify patients with frequent IDH. There was a large variety in the prevalence of symptoms and interventions. Major risk factors associated with IDH across studies were diabetes, a higher interdialytic weight gain, female gender, and lower body weight.

conclusionOur meta-analysis suggests that the prevalence of IDH is lower than 12% for both the EBPG and the Nadir <90 definition which is much lower than stated in most reviews.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationHumansHypotensionKidney Failure, ChronicNursing CarePrevalenceReference ValuesRenal DialysisDialysisIntradialytic hypotensionPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID31129661
PMCPMC6604263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.