ArticleContemporary clinical trials2019
Strong Hearts for New York: A multilevel community-based randomized cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention for rural women.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities-2.0 Effects on Weight: A Mediation Analysis.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2026Trial
- Implementation of Change Club action plans to promote built environment change in rural communities.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Two Iterations of a Community-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Intervention.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Trial
- Improvements in dietary intake, behaviors, and psychosocial measures in a community-randomized cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities 2.0.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Trial
- Changes in physical activity outcomes in the Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities (SHHC-2.0) community-based randomized trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Trial
- Improvements and Maintenance of Clinical and Functional Measures Among Rural Women: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities-2. 0 Cluster Randomized Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2022Trial
- The Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities Program 2.0: An RCT Examining Effects on Simple 7.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Trial
- Implementation of and Recommendations From the Change Club Civic Engagement Curriculum Targeting Health Behavior Improvement.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2026Article
- A scoping review comparing individual and multi-level physical activity interventions in rural women in the United States.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Educators' perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing a school-based nutrition, physical activity, and civic engagement intervention: a qualitative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Strong Teens for Healthy Schools: Protocol for evaluating a youth nutrition, physical activity, and civic engagement protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Process evaluation findings from Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities 2.0: a cardiovascular disease prevention intervention for rural women.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Article
- A qualitative exploration of the health needs and goals of urban women to inform the tailoring and adaptation of Strong Hearts Healthy Communities: a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention intervention.BMC public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRural midlife and older women have high rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and lower access to healthy living resources. The Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities (SHHC) intervention, tailored to the needs of rural women, demonstrated effectiveness on many outcomes. The purpose of the Strong Hearts for New York (SHNY) study is to evaluate the efficacy of an enhanced version of the curriculum (SHHC-2.0).
methodsSHNY is a randomized controlled efficacy intervention, comparing participants receiving the SHHC-2.0 curriculum with a delayed intervention control group. SHHC, informed by formative research, includes core elements from three evidence-based programs. Changes based on extensive outcome and process evaluation data were made to create SHHC-2.0. Classes will meet twice weekly for 24 weeks and include individual, social, and environmental components. Overweight women age 40 and over will be recruited from 11 rural, medically underserved communities in New York; data will be collected at baseline and 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks across individual, social, and environmental levels. Primary outcome is body weight. Secondary outcomes include Simple 7 (composite CVD risk score), anthropometric, physiologic, biochemical, physical activity, and dietary intake measures; healthy eating and exercise self-efficacy and attitudes; and self-efficacy of the social network of participants. DISCUSSION: The aims of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of the enhanced SHHC-2.0 program for participants, changes among participants' social networks, and the difference in outcomes when participants are and are not provided with technological tools (Fitbit and body composition scale).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.