Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129372›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2019

Strong Hearts for New York: A multilevel community-based randomized cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention for rural women.

Rebecca A Seguin, Meredith L Graham, Galen Eldridge, Miriam E Nelson, David Strogatz, Sara C Folta, Lynn Paul

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Implementation of Change Club action plans to promote built environment change in rural communities.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca A SeguinCornell University, Division of Nutritional Sciences, 412 Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: rs946@cornell.edu.
Meredith L GrahamCornell University, Division of Nutritional Sciences, 413 Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: mlg22@cornell.edu.
Galen EldridgeCornell University, Division of Nutritional Sciences, 413 Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: ge77@cornell.edu.
Miriam E NelsonHampshire College, 893 West St, Amherst, MA 01002, USA; Tufts University, Friedman School of Nutrition, 150 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA. Electronic address: miriamnelson@hampshire.edu.
David StrogatzBassett Research Institute, One Atwell Rd, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA. Electronic address: david.strogatz@bassett.org.
Sara C FoltaTufts University, Friedman School of Nutrition, 150 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA. Electronic address: sara.folta@tufts.edu.
Lynn PaulMontana State University Extension, 322 Reid Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.

Funding

Strong Hearts_Healthy Communities_A Rural Community CVD Prevention ProgramR01HL120702 · NHLBI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SEGUIN-FOWLER, REBECCA ANNE · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural midlife and older women have high rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and lower access to healthy living resources. The Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities (SHHC) intervention, tailored to the needs of rural women, demonstrated effectiveness on many outcomes. The purpose of the Strong Hearts for New York (SHNY) study is to evaluate the efficacy of an enhanced version of the curriculum (SHHC-2.0).

methodsSHNY is a randomized controlled efficacy intervention, comparing participants receiving the SHHC-2.0 curriculum with a delayed intervention control group. SHHC, informed by formative research, includes core elements from three evidence-based programs. Changes based on extensive outcome and process evaluation data were made to create SHHC-2.0. Classes will meet twice weekly for 24 weeks and include individual, social, and environmental components. Overweight women age 40 and over will be recruited from 11 rural, medically underserved communities in New York; data will be collected at baseline and 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks across individual, social, and environmental levels. Primary outcome is body weight. Secondary outcomes include Simple 7 (composite CVD risk score), anthropometric, physiologic, biochemical, physical activity, and dietary intake measures; healthy eating and exercise self-efficacy and attitudes; and self-efficacy of the social network of participants. DISCUSSION: The aims of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of the enhanced SHHC-2.0 program for participants, changes among participants' social networks, and the difference in outcomes when participants are and are not provided with technological tools (Fitbit and body composition scale).

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorAdultCardiovascular DiseasesCurriculumExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansNew YorkPatient Education as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRural PopulationCardiovascular diseaseCivic engagementNutritionPhysical activityRuralSocial network

Identifiers

PMID31129372
PMCPMC6606389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.