Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31129035›Full record

ArticleMedical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists

Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques.

Yibo Xie, Daniel Bourgeois, Beibei Guo, Rui Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical implementation of a hybrid solitary dynamic portal radiotherapy for left-sided post-mastectomy chest-wall and regional nodal irradiation using Monaco TPS.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yibo XieDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Daniel BourgeoisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Beibei GuoDepartment of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. Electronic address: rzhang@lsu.edu.
Louisiana State University · USMary Bird Perkins Cancer Center · US

Funding

Systematic evaluation of predicted outcomes and costs to inform clinical and policy decision making for emerging postmastectomy radiotherapiesK22CA204464 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI ZHANG, RUI · 2016 to 2018
$580k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA204464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been shown to improve the overall survival for invasive breast cancer patients, and many advanced radiotherapy technologies were adopted for PMRT. The purpose of our study is to compare various advanced PMRT techniques including fixed-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT), multiple arc VMAT (MA-VMAT), and tomotherapy (TOMO). Results of standard VMAT and mixed beam therapy that were published by our group previously were also included in the plan comparisons. Treatment plans were produced for nine PMRT patients previously treated in our clinic. The plans were evaluated based on planning target volume (PTV) coverage, dose homogeneity index (DHI), conformity index (CI), dose to organs at risk (OARs), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of pneumonitis, lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of second cancers, and risk of coronary events (RCE). All techniques produced clinically acceptable PMRT plans. Overall, fixed-beam IMRT delivered the lowest mean dose to contralateral breast (1.56 ± 0.4 Gy) and exhibited lowest LAR (0.6 ± 0.2%) of secondary contralateral breast cancer; NC-VMAT delivered the lowest mean dose to lungs (7.5 ± 0.8 Gy), exhibited lowest LAR (5.4 ± 2.8%) of secondary lung cancer and lowest NTCP (2.1 ± 0.4%) of pneumonitis; mixed beam therapy delivered the lowest mean dose to heart (7.1 ± 1.3 Gy) and exhibited lowest RCE (8.6 ± 7.1%); TOMO plans provided the most optimal target coverage while delivering higher dose to OARs than other techniques. Both NC-VMAT and MA-VMAT exhibited lower values of all OARs evaluation metrics compare to standard VMAT. Fixed-beam IMRT, NC-VMAT, and mixed beam therapy could be the optimal radiation technique for certain breast cancer patients after mastectomy.

Indexed as

MastectomyFemaleHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsIntensity-modulated radiotherapyPostmastectomy radiotherapyTomotherapyVolumetric modulated arc therapy

Identifiers

PMID31129035
PMCPMC6874719
OpenAlexW2946288596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.