Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31128888›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2019

Live-Animal Epigenome Editing: Convergence of Novel Techniques.

J Antonio Gomez, Ulrika Beitnere, David J Segal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Patch-seq: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. KRAB-Induced Heterochromatin Effectively SilencesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Antonio GomezGenome Center and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Ulrika BeitnereGenome Center and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
David J SegalGenome Center and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: djsegal@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Training Program in Oncogenic Signals and Chromosome BiologyT32CA108459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2006 to 2020
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenome editing refers to the generation of precise chromatin alterations and their effects on gene expression and cell biology. Until recently, much of the efforts in epigenome editing were limited to tissue culture models of disease. However, the convergence of techniques from different fields including mammalian genetics, virology, and CRISPR engineering is advancing epigenome editing into a new era. Researchers are increasingly embracing the use of multicellular model organisms to test the role of specific chromatin alterations in development and disease. The challenge of successful live-animal epigenomic editing will depend on a well-informed foundation of the current methodologies for cell-specific delivery and editing accuracy. Here we review the opportunities for basic research and therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

EpigenomeAnimalsCell TransplantationClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDependovirusEpigenomicsGene EditingMice, TransgenicZinc Fingersanimal modelscancerCRISPRdeliveryepigenomic editingneurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID31128888
PMCPMC6608710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.