ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2019
National patterns of care and fertility outcomes for reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chances of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing conservative management of early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction update · 2022Pooled it
- Hysterectomy Status and Outcomes in Patients With Grade 1, Stage IA Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma.O&G open · 2025Article
- Age, lifestyle, and disease affect ciliary transport in the human fallopian tube.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Uterine-Conserving Treatment Options for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Stromal Pbrm1 mediates chromatin remodeling necessary for embryo implantation in the mouse uterus.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Prediction of complete regression in fertility-sparing patients with endometrial cancer and apical hyperplasia: the GLOBAL model in a large Chinese cohort.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Conservative treatment of endometrial cancer in women of reproductive age (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Conservative management of early-stage endometrial cancer for fertility preservation: a survey study among Swedish gynecologists and gynecological oncologists.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen and fresh embryo transfer in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma: a retrospective study in a high-volume reproductive center.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Article
- Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes.Cancers · 2022Review
- Analysis of Factors Associated With Recurrence of Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Women AfterFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Contemporary Fertility-Sparing Management Options of Early Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in Young Nulliparous Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Risk factors of endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: implication for clinical treatments.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- Fertility-Sparing Methods in Adolescents Affected by Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Fertility preservation in women with early-stage gynecologic cancer: optimizing oncologic and reproductive outcomes.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021Review
- Review
- Automated system for diagnosing endometrial cancer by adopting deep-learning technology in hysteroscopy.PloS one · 2021Article
- Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical, Ovarian, and Endometrial Malignancies.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Review
- Improving response to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough it is uncommon, the incidence of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia among reproductive-aged women is increasing. The fertility outcomes in this population are not well described.
objectiveWe aim to describe the patterns of care and fertility outcomes of reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cohort of women aged ≤45 years with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia diagnosed in 2000 to 2014 were identified in Truven Marketscan, an insurance claims database of commercially insured patients in the United States. Treatment information, including use of progestin therapy, hysterectomy, and assisted fertility services, was identified and collected using a combination of Common Procedural Terminology codes, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes, and National Drug Codes. Pregnancy events were identified from claims data using a similar technique. Patients were categorized as receiving progestin therapy alone, progestin therapy followed by hysterectomy, or standard surgical management with hysterectomy alone. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with receiving fertility-sparing treatment.
resultsA total of 4007 reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia were identified. The majority of these patients (n = 3189; 79.6%) received standard surgical management. Of the 818 patients treated initially with progestins, 397 (48.5%) subsequently underwent hysterectomy, whereas 421 (51.5%) did not. Patients treated with progestin therapy had a lower median age than those who received standard surgical management (median age, 36 vs 41 years; P < .001). The proportion of patients receiving progestin therapy increased significantly over the observation period, with 24.9% treated at least initially with progestin therapy in 2014 (P < .001). Multivariable analysis shows that younger age, a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia diagnosis rather than endometrial cancer, and diagnosis later in the study period were all associated with a greater likelihood of receiving progestin therapy (P < .0001). Among the 421 patients who received progestin therapy alone, 92 patients (21.8%; 92/421) had 131 pregnancies, including 49 live births for a live birth rate of 11.6%. Among the 397 patients treated with progestin therapy followed by hysterectomy, 25 patients (6.3%; 25/397) had 34 pregnancies with 13 live births. The median age of patients who experienced a live birth following diagnosis during the study period was 36 years (interquartile range, 33-38). The use of some form of assisted fertility services was observed in 15.5% patients who were treated with progestin therapy. Among patients who experienced any pregnancy event following diagnosis, 54% of patients used some form of fertility treatment. For patients who experienced a live birth following diagnosis, 50% of patients received fertility treatment. Median time to live birth following diagnosis was 756 days (interquartile range, 525-1077). Patients treated with progestin therapy were more likely to experience a live birth if they had used assisted fertility services (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-10.1; P < .0001).
conclusionThe number of patients who received fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia increased over time. However, the proportion of women who experience a live birth following these diagnoses is relatively small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.