Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31128074›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2019

Revisiting the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale.

Jessica R Gorman, Tonya M Pan-Weisz, Julia H Drizin, H Irene Su, Vanessa L Malcarne

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Suboptimal quality of female oncofertility care is associated with lowered quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing gaps in motherhood after cancer: development and psychometric testing of the Survivorship Oncofertility Barriers Scale.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Higher reproductive concerns associated with fertility consultation: a cross-sectional study of young adult male cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica R GormanSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-3950-4260
Tonya M Pan-WeiszSan Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, CA.
Julia H DrizinSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
H Irene SuMoores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Vanessa L MalcarneSan Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, CA.

Funding

The Oncofertility Consortium: Fertility Preservation for WomanUL1RR024926 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOODRUFF, TERESA K · 2007 to 2007
$692k
Predictors of ovarian failure after chemotherapy in young breast cancer patientsK23HD058799 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SU, HUI-CHUN IRENE · 2009 to 2013
$546k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024926NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD058799NIH HHS HD-058799-01NIH HHS UL1 RR024926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this study were to examine the factor structure and reliability of the multidimensional Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale in a sample of female cancer survivors during their reproductive years, younger than age 45.

methodsFemale reproductive-aged survivors (N = 238; current age, 18 to 44 y) with a variety of cancer diagnoses completed a web-based survey that included the RCAC scale. Three structural models were examined via confirmatory factor analysis: (a) one-factor, (b) higher-order with one second-order factor and six first-order factors, and (c) oblique six-factor. Reliability was examined using omega total and Revelle omega total.

resultsOnly the oblique six-factor model of the RCAC scale fits well. Omega total and Revelle omega total estimates for all of the six three-item subscales were in the nearly satisfactory to good range (.66 to.87).

conclusionsThe RCAC scale was found to have satisfactory factor structure and reliability when measuring a range of reproductive concerns experienced by female reproductive-aged survivors. The RCAC scale is a multidimensional measure of varying aspects of reproductive concerns, and results suggest that the scale may be best represented as a profile of subscale scores. The subscale scores would be useful for tailoring recommendations and interventions to more effectively address the diverse reproductive concerns of female reproductive-aged survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsInfertility, FemaleNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleFertility PreservationHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultcancerfertilitymeasurementoncologyreproductive concernsreproductive healthsurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID31128074
PMCPMC8428791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.